within 15 miles of Houma practice in Criminal Louisiana


The Law Office of Dennis J. Elfert, APLC

Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Damon J. Baldone & Associates, APLC

Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

The Law Office Of Camille Saltz Babin

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Eldon R Harrall Jr Aplc

Child Support, Contract, Criminal, Farms, DUI-DWI

Cancienne Law Firm

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Native People, Military

Malbrough & Wright, APLC

Child Custody, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Products Liability, Estate

Jessica L Duet, Attorney At Law, LLC

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Real Estate, Health Care Other, Sexual Harassment

Landry Magee LLC

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Lawsuit & Dispute

Todd M. Joffrion, Attorney At Law

Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Business, Bankruptcy & Debt

Carl T Schwab, LLC

Health Care Other, Employment, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ates

... LOLLEY, J. This criminal appeal arises from the Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union, State of Louisiana. Edward Eugene Ates, Jr. ... The offense of illegal use of a weapon requires proof of either general intent or criminal negligence. State v. Walker, 26,026 (La.App. ...

State v. Ates

8 So.3d 581 (2009). STATE of Louisiana v. Edward Eugene ATES, Jr. No. 2008-KO-2341. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 15, 2009. Denied.

State v. Jones

... 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Under the Jackson standard, a review of a criminal conviction record for sufficiency of evidence does not require the court to ask whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ...