South Fork Consumer Protection Lawyer, Colorado

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Warranties, Recreational Products

Ruth M Acheson

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  40 Years

Ruth M. Acheson

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  40 Years

J Michael Musick

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  31 Years

James Michael Musick

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  31 Years
Speak with Lawyer.com

Mary Katharine Hayes

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  27 Years

Gordon H Rowe

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  75 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find South Fork Consumer Protection Lawyers and South Fork Consumer Protection Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Consumer Rights areas including Identity Theft attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Benzing

... The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the defendant automobile insurance companies violated the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) when they failed to disclose to insurance purchasers this court's decision in DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co., 30 P.3d 167 (Colo.2001). ...

Flood v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC

... See Russell v. Equifax, 74 F.3d 30, 33 (2d Cir.1996). We have previously observed that the federal statute is a remedial consumer protection statute and should be liberally construed in favor of the consumer. See Shapiro & Meinhold v. Zartman, 823 P.2d 120, 124 (Colo. 1992). ...

Kruse v. McKenna

... In this case we address whether the plaintiff, Douglas M. McKenna, has standing to assert in Colorado state court an assigned claim for violation of the facsimile transmission provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 USC § 227 (2003). ...