Stamford Antitrust Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

Peter M. Nolin

Land Use & Zoning, Class Action, Bad Faith Insurance, Antitrust
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  40 Years

Anthony M. Macleod

Public Utilities, Employment, Antitrust, Administrative Law, Wrongful Termination
Status:  In Good Standing           

Jesse Benjamin Mitchell

Litigation, Antitrust, Credit & Debt, Bankruptcy
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  14 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Display Sponsorship

TIPS

Easily find Stamford Antitrust Lawyers and Stamford Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit District

... In this appeal, we must decide whether the trial court properly imposed liability upon the defendant under the Connecticut Antitrust Act (act); General Statutes § 35-24 et seq.; and, if so, whether the trial court properly awarded the plaintiff treble damages, including lost profits ...

Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.

... Second, we must determine whether the plaintiff may maintain a claim, predicated on the same factual allegations underlying the antitrust claim, pursuant to the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. ... I. ANTITRUST ACT. ...

Mazzola v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

... court based this conclusion upon two alternative theories: (1) that the public utilities commission (hereinafter the PUC) had "primary" jurisdiction of the matters complained of; or (2) that the activities of the defendant challenged by the plaintiff were "immune" from antitrust liability. ...