Strausstown Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Crawford, Jr.
About | Practice Areas
James E. Crawford, Jr. & Associates, LLC
999 Corporate Blvd. Suite 100 Linthicum, MD 21090» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
Move Forward With Confidence

Our Firm's team of family, criminal, and business lawyers understand that each case presents unique challenges and must be met with equally unique approaches.

800-789-9220
1. James Crawford, Jr. Linthicum, MD
  Attorney at Law - MD, 1992
  University of Baltimore J.D. 1992
2. AboutJames E. Crawford, Jr. & Associates, LLC
  When you need us, we're there.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael J. Reed

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Felony, Personal Injury, Civil & Human Rights

Michael Reed practices law in Pennsylvania. He attended Villanova Law and have practiced for more than 25 years in Chester County. The cases have been... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

610-647-6777

1 City Hall Pl, Coatesville, PA 19320

Howard M. Lightman

Corporate, Collection, Criminal, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1136 Penn Avenue, Reading, PA 19610

Richard B. MacDonald

Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

312 West Orange Street, Lancaster, PA 17603

Justin McShane

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3601 Vartan Way, Harrisburg, PA 17110

Matthew R. Gover

Criminal, Federal, Felony, Grand Jury Proceedings

Status: Deceased Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

2411 N Front St, Harrisburg, PA 17110

Steve Edward Jarmon

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

24 E. Market Street, West Chester, PA 19381

Eric D. Strand

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

27 S. Darlington St., West Chester, PA 19382

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

... The primary issue raised is whether Respondent's felony convictions for fraudulently procuring a credit card constitute "infamous crimes" for purposes of Article II, Section 7 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which prohibits anyone convicted of such an offense from holding an ...

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

... [4] Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in grading forgery of a money order as a second-degree felony. We hold Appellant's negotiation of a counterfeit United States Postal Service money order constituted ...

Commonwealth v. Graham

... The suppression court did not err. Â¶ 7 Appellant next argues the court erred by grading the burglary charge as a felony of the first degree because the structure at issue was not ... (c) Grading.â€”. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), burglary is a felony of the first degree. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Strausstown Felony Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

James E. Crawford, Jr. & Associates, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael J. Reed

Howard M. Lightman

Richard B. MacDonald

Justin McShane

Matthew R. Gover

Steve Edward Jarmon

Eric D. Strand

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

CORPUS DELECTI

HABEAS CORPUS

JURY NULLIFICATION

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INTERROGATION

MENS REA

FELONY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Commonwealth v. Griffin

Commonwealth v. Pantalion

Commonwealth v. Graham

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details