Tampa Criminal Lawyer, Florida, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Anthony B. Marchese

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Immigration

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4010 West Boy Scout Blvd., Tampa, FL 33607

DeeAnn D. Athan

Family Law, Antitrust, Constitutional Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2917 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, FL 33609

Adam Leo Bantner

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Freedom of Information

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4951B East Adamo Drive, Tampa, FL 33605

Jose L. Estrada

Medical Products & Devices, Criminal, Medical Malpractice, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1419 West Waters Avenue, Tampa, FL 33604

Frances Martinez

Family Law, Divorce, Adoption, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2917 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, FL 33609

Mark J. O'Brien

Criminal, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

511 West Bay Street, Tampa, FL 33606

Craig A. Epifanio

Traffic, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

9500 Koger Blvd N., Saint Petersburg, FL 33702

R. Lane Lastinger

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Federal, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

275 96th Avenue North, Saint Petersburg, FL 33702

Walter L. Grantham

Products Liability, Medical Malpractice, DUI-DWI, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

19321-C U.S. Highway 19 North, Clearwater, FL 33764

H.J. Jim Hale

Animal Bite, Criminal, Bed Bug, Bad Faith Insurance

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2450 Sunset Point Road, Clearwater, FL 33765

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Tampa Criminal Lawyer, Florida, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Anthony B. Marchese

DeeAnn D. Athan

Adam Leo Bantner

Jose L. Estrada

Frances Martinez

Mark J. O'Brien

Craig A. Epifanio

R. Lane Lastinger

Walter L. Grantham

H.J. Jim Hale

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

ACQUITTAL

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SPECIFIC INTENT

ACTUS REUS

HUNG JURY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

WARRANT

JURY NULLIFICATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details