Twining Juvenile Law Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nickolas Hannawa
About | Practice Areas
Hannawa Law PC
2909 E Big Beaver Rd Troy, MI 48083» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Full-service legal experts on your side.

Whatever the specific details of your situation may be, our attorneys are ready to fight for you and guide you through every step of the process.

248-466-0770
1. Nickolas Hannawa Troy, MI
  Attorney at Law, MI
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D. 2013
2. AboutHannawa Law PC
  Full-service legal experts on your side.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Twining Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Twining Criminal lawyers.

Jacob Anthony Cristoforo

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Litigation, Traffic, Misdemeanor

Jacob Cristoforo is a practicing attorney in the state of Michigan.

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

989-891-6688

P.O. Box 428, Standish, MI 48658

Edward M. Czuprynski

Other, Litigation, Criminal, Legal Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

814 N Monroe St, Bay City, MI 48708

Kathleen V. E. Reder

Other, Family Law, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

1217 Montague St, Midland, MI 48642

Jessica L. Robison

Juvenile Law, Landlord-Tenant, Family Law, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

220 W Ellsworth St, Midland, MI 48640

James O. Branson

Other, Real Estate, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

333 W Ellsworth St, Midland, MI 48640

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re AP

... A. FAMILY LAW'S CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION. In this case, there are two distinct and separate statutory schemes affecting the care and custody of the minor child: the juvenile code and the CCA. ... 413 B. THE CHILD CUSTODY ACT AND THE JUVENILE CODE. ...

In re Jones

... Following that termination, the court on July 3, 2007, attempted to again terminate their rights to their daughter, make the child a permanent ward of the court, and commit the child to the Department of Human Services, this time under the Michigan juvenile code, MCL 712A.1 et ...

People v. DiPiazza

... registration under SORA to 10 years. II. BACKGROUND. A. HOLMES YOUTHFUL TRAINEE ACT. HYTA is essentially a juvenile diversion program for criminal defendants under the age of 21. Under the act,. if an individual pleads guilty ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Twining Juvenile Law Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Hannawa Law PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jacob Anthony Cristoforo

Edward M. Czuprynski

Kathleen V. E. Reder

Jessica L. Robison

James O. Branson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA BARGAIN

ACTUS REUS

MOTION IN LIMINE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

WARRANT

MISTRIAL

EAVESDROPPING

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

HUNG JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re AP

In re Jones

People v. DiPiazza

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details