Walling DUI-DWI Lawyer, Tennessee

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Knowlton
About | Practice Areas
Michael H. Knowlton, P.C.
16 S Madison Ave Cookeville, TN 38501» view map
Criminal Defense
Defending Your Rights

Michael H. Knowlton, P.C. has been representing clients in Middle Tennessee for more than 25 years.

931-526-8359
1. Michael Knowlton Cookeville, TN
  Attorney at Law- TN, 1991
  Nashville School of Law, J.D. 1991
2. AboutMichael H. Knowlton, P.C.
  Defending Your Rights
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Walling DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Walling Criminal lawyers.

Brandon Griffin

Trusts, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

2267 Charles Hennessee Rd., Sparta, TN 38583

John P. Partin

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

309 West Main Street, Mc Minnville, TN 37110

Ricky Stacy

Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, State Government

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Mc Minnville, TN 37111

Matthew T. Colvard

Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

131 E Main St, Mc Minnville, TN 37110

Eugene Oakleigh Marquette

Aviation, Industry Specialties, Criminal

Status: Retired Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

483 Windrowe Dr, Cookeville, TN 38506

Geno Marquette

Criminal, Aviation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

483 Windrowe Dr, Cookeville, TN 38506

Randy York

Criminal, Prosecution

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

1519 A Spring St, Cookeville, TN 38506

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Brooks

... On appeal, Brooks raises the following issues: (1) whether the language of the DUI pattern jury instruction, particularly the phrase "impairs to any extent," is confusing and reduces the State's burden of proof; (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting the results of his breath ...

Macon v. SHELBY COUNTY GOV'T CIVIL SERVICE

... Petitioner/Appellant Jimmy Macon ("Mr. Macon") was employed as a deputy jailer with the Shelby County Sheriff's Department ("Sheriff's Department") when he was arrested on August 28, 2003 in West Memphis, Arkansas for DUI, speeding, and improper lane change. ...

State v. Gray

... OPINION. JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE. A Marion County Circuit Court jury convicted the defendant, Jackie Lynn Gray, of two counts of driving under the influence (DUI) and speeding. The trial court merged the DUI ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Walling DUI-DWI Lawyer, Tennessee

Sponsored Law Firm

Michael H. Knowlton, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brandon Griffin

John P. Partin

Ricky Stacy

Matthew T. Colvard

Eugene Oakleigh Marquette

Geno Marquette

Randy York

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

HABEAS CORPUS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

ACTUS REUS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

CAPITAL CASE

INTENTIONAL TORT

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Brooks

Macon v. SHELBY COUNTY GOV'T CIVIL SERVICE

State v. Gray

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details