Weed Juvenile Law Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Benjamin Magid
About | Practice Areas
Magid Law
112 Main Street Weaverville, CA 96093» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Experienced, Aggressive Criminal Defense

Hiring a criminal defense attorney is one of the most important decisions you will ever make. Don’t be a victim of the system. Choose Benjamin Magid as your attorney.

800-761-7580
1. Benjamin Magid Weaverville, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2018
  Beasley School of Law J.D.
2. AboutMagid Law
  Experienced, Aggressive Criminal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Weed Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Weed lawyers.

David Illingwort Clough

Trusts, Child Custody, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

15020 Shoreline Dr, Weed, CA 96094

Barry Michael Price

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

9702 Burley Dr, Weed, CA 96094

William Withall Anderson

Divorce & Family Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

3600 Eddy Creek Rd, Weed, CA 96094

Robert David Winston

Real Estate, Government, Business, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

C. Michael Mccanta

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

6602 Hogan Dr, Weed, CA 96094

Duane Lightwater

General Practice

Status: Suspended Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

Frank Vincent Aiello

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

Roger Thomas Kosel

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

George Cushman Keeler

General Practice

Status: Inactive Licensed: 73 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

Stephen Frederick Darger

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

Mount Shasta, CA 96067

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Nguyen

... Jonathan Laba; Maureen Pacheco; Marsha Levick; Neha Desai; and Jessica Feierman for Pacific Juvenile Defender Center, Juvenile Law Center, Juvenile Division of the Los Angeles Public Defender, Alternate Public Defender, National Center for Youth Law and Youth Law ...

In re SB

164 Cal.App.4th 289 (2008). In re SB, a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL B., Defendant and Appellant. No. D052202. ...

In re Alexis E.

171 Cal.App.4th 438 (2009). In re ALEXIS E. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. ... In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, Â§ 300 et seq.), [1] Patrick E., father of three dependent minor children (Father), appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Weed Juvenile Law Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Magid Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David Illingwort Clough

Barry Michael Price

William Withall Anderson

Robert David Winston

C. Michael Mccanta

Duane Lightwater

Frank Vincent Aiello

Roger Thomas Kosel

George Cushman Keeler

Stephen Frederick Darger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

PROSECUTE

NOLO CONTENDERE

JURY NULLIFICATION

ARREST

SEARCH WARRANT

FEDERAL COURT

BURDEN OF PROOF

MOTION IN LIMINE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Nguyen

In re SB

In re Alexis E.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details