Woodruff County, AR Contract Lawyers

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Robert Daniel Mcgill

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  34 Years

Joseph Nelson Peacock

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  54 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Arkansas Contract Lawyers and Arkansas Contract Law Firms for your location. Narrow your Contract attorney search for Arkansas by major city or a specific Arkansas city using the city list. Or search for Arkansas Contract attorneys by county. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Antitrust, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Smelser

... v. J & M McKee, 263 Ark. 20, 563 SW2d 409 (1978), reh'g denied, April 17, 1978. The essential elements of a contract include (1) competent parties, (2) subject matter, (3) legal consideration, (4) mutual agreement, and (5) mutual obligations. Ward v. Williams, 354 Ark. ...

Preston v. Stoops

... Preston also asserts that the circuit court erred in ruling in favor of Stoops because it did not decide the issue of whether there was a contract and whether that contract was breached. We affirm the circuit court on all issues raised on appeal. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. ...

Artman v. Hoy

... automatic termination of alimony obligations upon Hoy's remarriage; and (2) in determining that Hoy was entitled to attorney's fees in defending Artman's motion to terminate alimony because there was no lawsuit to recover unpaid monies or for breach of contract, and Artman ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.