Baldwin DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard Morris
About | Practice Areas
Morris Law Group PA
7380 France Ave S. Suite 250 Edina, MN 55435» view map
Criminal Defense Law
We Are Experts In What We Do

Whether it’s your home or business, you are important to us. Reach out today to set up a meeting with one of our experienced Edina lawyers.

800-872-9610
1. Richard Morris Edina, MN
  Attorney at Law- MN, 1974
  William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutMorris Law Group PA
  We Are Experts In What We Do
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Baldwin DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Baldwin Criminal lawyers.

R. Michael Waterman

Construction, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Joel D. Schlitz

Criminal, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 Second Street, Hudson, WI 54016

Brian Thomas Smestad

Juvenile Law, Employment, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1020 10Th Ave, Baldwin, WI 54002

Aaron Anton Nelson

Criminal, Consumer Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

103 N Knowles Ave, New Richmond, WI 54017

Mark R. Mullen

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Insurance, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

1561 Commerce Court, River Falls, WI 54022

Lars Loberg

Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

CONTACT

359 W Main St, Ellsworth, WI 54011

Sarah Diane Slice

Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

808 Carmichael Rd, Hudson, WI 54016

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

... Id. at 100. In rejecting the plaintiff's challenge, the court clarified that a summary suspension under the "zero tolerance" law is not a summary suspension under DUI law, and therefore "[p]laintiff's reliance on DUI law is puzzling because plaintiff was not arrested for DUI." Id. ...

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

... The State counters that because Malsbury's Washington conviction was originally charged as driving under the influence (DUI) and later amended to reckless driving with OWI-like penalties, the conviction counts for purposes of Wisconsin's OWI laws. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Baldwin DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Morris Law Group PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

R. Michael Waterman

Joel D. Schlitz

Brian Thomas Smestad

Aaron Anton Nelson

Mark R. Mullen

Lars Loberg

Sarah Diane Slice

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

CIVIL

CONVICTION

ACCESSORY

PROSECUTE

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

INFORMED CONSENT

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details