Beverly Hills Criminal Lawyer, California, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Alexandra Kazarian
About | Practice Areas
The Law Office of Alexandra Kazarian
15851 Whittier Blvd Whittier, CA 90603Â» view map
Criminal Law
Aggressive & Experienced Criminal Defense

Trust the Law Office of Alexandra Kazarian with your Criminal Defense Case in Whittier & Los Angeles California.

800-773-5851
1. Alexandra Kazarian Whittier, CA
  Attorney at Law - 2006
  Pepperdine SOL J.D. 2006
2. AboutAlexandra Kazarian Law Firm
  Ms. Kazarian is known for aggressive representation & extensive experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law, Sex/Drug Crimes, Domestic Violence, Violent Crime, DUI Cases
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Reviews
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Julia Susanna Swanson

Animal Bite, Criminal, Defamation & Slander, Employee Rights

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

499 No. Canon Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210

Lisa Marie DeIuliis

Animal Bite, Criminal, Construction Contracts, Construction

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

12400 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90025

Dana Raz

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

6404 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048

Kent Drew Heeringa

Apparel, Criminal, Bad Faith Insurance, Animal Bite

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

12304 Santa Monica Blvd, Ste 300, Los Angeles, CA 90025

Gregory Brenner

Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Murray Greiff

Litigation, Criminal, Collection, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

11355 West Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90064

John Martin Gallagher

Immigration, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4929 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90010

Michelle Will

Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal, Divestitures

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

5670 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90036

Robert Little

Commercial Real Estate, Litigation, Federal Appellate Practice, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

5670 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90036

Edward J. Blum

Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90010

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

... Code, Â§Â§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 264.1), forcible sexual penetration while acting in concert (id., Â§Â§ 289, subd. (a)(1), 264.1), and active participation in a criminal street gang (id., Â§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury further found that the sex ...

In re Lawrence

... 1189 Carrie L. Hempel, Michael J. Brennan and Heidi L. Rummel for Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. Munger, Tolles & Olson, Blanca F. Young and Hailyn J. Chen for Stanford Criminal Justice Center as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. ...

People v. Vazquez

... (b)-(d)), and that he committed the murder for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (Â§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). Appellant was sentenced to a total term in state prison of 50 years to life. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Beverly Hills Criminal Lawyer, California, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Office of Alexandra Kazarian

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Julia Susanna Swanson

Lisa Marie DeIuliis

Dana Raz

Kent Drew Heeringa

Gregory Brenner

Murray Greiff

John Martin Gallagher

Michelle Will

Robert Little

Edward J. Blum

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

MISTRIAL

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

ARRAIGNMENT

BURGLARY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

In re Lawrence

People v. Vazquez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details