Bridgeport Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm


David Gregg Volman Lawyer

David Gregg Volman

VERIFIED
Family Law, Bankruptcy, Real Estate, Personal Injury, Criminal

In 1987, I joined the law firm of Kleban & Samor in Southport, Connecticut as an associate. In 1989, I joined the law firm of Yudkin & Young in Shelto... (more)

Joseph C. Maya Lawyer

Joseph C. Maya

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Employment, Accident & Injury, Criminal

Joseph C. Maya believes in providing large firm experience but with small firm communication and attention. His practice areas of the law include divo... (more)

Matthew Lloyd Brovender Lawyer

Matthew Lloyd Brovender

VERIFIED
Criminal, Personal Injury, Traffic
We provide complete legal services in all areas of Criminal Defense (including DUI, traffic violatio

We provide complete legal services in all areas of Criminal Defense (including DUI, traffic violations, misdemeanors, felonies, white-collar crime, an... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-460-2651

Maurice David Maitland Lawyer

Maurice David Maitland

VERIFIED
Accident & Injury, Immigration, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Car Accident

With over 25 years of legal experience and 14 years within private practice, Attorney Maurice Maitland has been a strong advocate for advancing justic... (more)

Speak with Lawyer.com
John Lino Ponzini Lawyer

John Lino Ponzini

VERIFIED
Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Elder Law, Estate

Attorney Ponzini is dedicated to providing high quality service to his clients. He takes the time to research your situation completely and bring abou... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-656-0710

Scott  Leventhal Lawyer

Scott Leventhal

VERIFIED
DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury, Criminal, Workers' Compensation

Representing the accused and the injured since 1957. We understand that sometimes good people make mistakes. The story of the LoRicco family and t... (more)

Kevin Murray Smith Lawyer

Kevin Murray Smith

VERIFIED
Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

The Pattis & Smith Law Firm is a talented tactical team of relentless criminal defense attorneys and high conflict civil lawyers. We are licensed to w... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-951-4610

Andrew M Amendola Lawyer

Andrew M Amendola

VERIFIED
Estate, Accident & Injury, Motor Vehicle, Criminal, Real Estate

Andrew Amendola proudly serves East Haven, CT and the neighboring communities in the areas of estate, accident and injury, motor vehicle, criminal def... (more)

Daniel P. Weiner Lawyer

Daniel P. Weiner

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Divorce, Car Accident

Daniel P. Weiner has served people in Fairfield County and throughout the state of Connecticut for nearly 40 years. He and his staff are committed ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

203-348-5846

Mark Daniel Sherman Lawyer

Mark Daniel Sherman

Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Misdemeanor

Mark Sherman is a lawyer in Stamford who focuses on Criminal Defense cases. He has tried cases involving civil litigation, Connecticut college & unive... (more)

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Display Sponsorship

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Bridgeport Criminal Lawyers and Bridgeport Criminal Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Criminal practice areas such as DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime and Traffic matters.

LEGAL TERMS

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)
The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)
A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)
An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)
In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)
A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)
Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)
The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)
A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) § 54-251 and General Statutes § 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...