By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS v. Rohrbach

... II. Trial Court Proceedings. At trial, the Board asserted that the Rohrbachs' parcel was zoned "A-AGRICULTURE" and that the composting operation was not a permitted use by right under the terms of that classification. The agricultural ...

Shupe v. Boulder County

... he was unable to find the principal use was agricultural under the code's definition of "principal use." The director instead concluded the principal use of the property was residential because "[t]he primary purpose of this parcel is a residential use with Open Agriculture as an ...

BD. OF CTY. COM. CTY. OF LOGAN v. Vandemoer

... methods or practices that are commonly or reasonably associated with agricultural production;" specifically including the employment of new technology.); Â§ 39-1-103(5)(a), CRS2007 (providing statutory scheme for favorable tax treatment of agriculture); Douglas County Bd. ...

Canon City Agriculture Lawyer, Colorado

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Lindsey S Topper

George H. Salley

Joanna K. Smith

Paul Snyder

Paul Snyder

Steven M. Werner

Erica Vasconcellos

S Kent Karber

S Kent Karber

S. Kent Karber

TIPS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS v. Rohrbach

Shupe v. Boulder County

BD. OF CTY. COM. CTY. OF LOGAN v. Vandemoer

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details