Conchas Dam Estate Planning Lawyer, New Mexico

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Gift Taxation

Michael L. Gregory

General Practice
Status:  Inactive           

Tim J. O'Quinn

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Heidi Lyn Adams

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

Thomas E. Blakeney

Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

Kirk C. Chavez

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Ricky D. Purcell

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Ricky D. Purcell

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Nancy G. English

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Timothy Lee Rose

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           

Donald C. Schutte

Corporate, Natural Resources, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Power of Attorney
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Conchas Dam Estate Planning Lawyers and Conchas Dam Estate Planning Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Estate areas including Trusts, Wills & Probate and Power of Attorney attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES

An exceedingly complex legal doctrine that limits the amount of time that property can be controlled after death by a person's instructions in a will. For examp... (more...)
An exceedingly complex legal doctrine that limits the amount of time that property can be controlled after death by a person's instructions in a will. For example, a person would not be allowed to leave property to her husband for his life, then to her children for their lives, then to her grandchildren. The gift would potentially go to the grandchildren at a point too remote in time.

NET ESTATE

The value of all property owned at death less liabilities or debts.

SPRINKLING TRUST

A trust that gives the person managing it (the trustee) the discretion to disburse its funds among the beneficiaries in any way he or she sees fit.

POUR-OVER WILL

A will that 'pours over' property into a trust when the will maker dies. Property left through the will must go through probate before it goes into the trust.

IRREVOCABLE TRUST

A permanent trust. Once you create it, it cannot be revoked, amended or changed in any way.

SWEARING MATCH

A case that turns on the word of one witness versus another. The outcome of a swearing match usually depends on whom the jury finds most trustworthy.

BENEFICIARY

A person or organization legally entitled to receive benefits through a legal device, such as a will, trust or life insurance policy.

INTER VIVOS TRUST

The Latin name, favored by some lawyers, for a living trust. 'Inter vivos' is Latin for 'between the living.'

PER CAPITA

Under a will, the most common method of determining what share of property each beneficiary gets when one of the beneficiaries dies before the willmaker, leavin... (more...)
Under a will, the most common method of determining what share of property each beneficiary gets when one of the beneficiaries dies before the willmaker, leaving children of his or her own. For example, Fred leaves his house jointly to his son Alan and his daughter Julie. But Alan dies before Fred, leaving two young children. If Fred's will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property per capita, Julie and the two grandchildren will each take a third. If, on the other hand, Fred's will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property per stirpes, Julie will receive one-half of the property, and Alan's two children will share his half in equal shares (through Alan by right of representation).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Oldham v. Oldham

... Id. {9} We granted Wife's petition for certiorari to address two issues: (1) whether a final judgment distributing marital property pursuant to Section 40-4-20(B) revokes the governing estate planning instruments of the deceased party when the deceased party dies during the ...

Oldham v. Oldham

... A judgment or decree terminating all property rights pursuant to Section 40-4-20(B) meets the definition of a divorce pursuant to Section 45-2-804(A)(2) and is sufficient to revoke governing estate planning instruments pursuant to Section 45-2-804(B)(1)(a). ...

Oldham v. Oldham

... A judgment or decree terminating all property rights pursuant to Section 40-4-20(B) meets the definition of a divorce pursuant to Section 45-2-804(A)(2) and is sufficient to revoke governing estate planning instruments pursuant to Section 45-2-804(B)(1)(a). ...