Dublin Discrimination Lawyer, Virginia


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Kristopher R Olin

Collection, Medical Malpractice, Civil Rights, DUI-DWI
Status:  In Good Standing           

Mark Mckinley Caldwell

Motor Vehicle, Workers' Compensation, Disability, Premises Liability
Status:  In Good Standing           

Joe Painter

Antitrust, Constitutional Law, Traffic, White Collar Crime
Status:  In Good Standing           

Mary Teasdale Scarola

Administrative Law, Elder Law, Consumer Bankruptcy, Clean Air Practice
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  16 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Dublin Discrimination Lawyers and Dublin Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Winborne v. Virginia Lottery

... 3. Under Bacon v. City of Richmond, 475 F.3d 633 (4th Cir.2007), the Virginia Lottery and its executive director are not liable for the alleged claims of disability discrimination against the Petitioners; and. 4. Pursuant to Bacon, injunctive ...

Hopkins v. Com.

... [3]. The trial court ruled, assuming a prima facie case of discrimination was made, there was "sufficient cause" for the first two strikes based on the Commonwealth's knowledge of the jurors' criminal records. The trial court continued: ...

Hopkins v. Commonwealth

... [2]. The trial court ruled, assuming a prima facie case of discrimination was made, there was "sufficient cause" for the first two strikes based on the Commonwealth's knowledge of the jurors' criminal records. The trial court continued: ...