Mr Jack Irving Esensten
Law Office of Jack I. Esensten
Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Probate
Experience:
71 years
Language(s):
English
Jack Irving Esensten | Palos Verdes Peninsula Divorce & Family Lawyer
Top Local Lawyers
Premium
Mark Anthony Velez
Law Office of Mark A. Velez, Professional Law Corp.
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Juvenile Law, Felony
22939 Hawthorne Blvd. Ste. 309
Torrance, CA 90505
Premium
Michael Scott Braun
Michael S. Braun Injury Law
Accident & Injury, Real Estate, DUI-DWI, Insurance, Traffic
21515 Hawthorne Blvd. Ste 670
Torrance, CA 90503
Premium
Michael Dittrich Shook
Michael D Shook Attorney At Law
Divorce & Family Law,
2276 Torrance Blvd
Torrance, CA 90501
Premium
Amiel Lee Wade
Wade Litigation
Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate, Business
2001 Artesia Blvd. UNIT 103
Redondo Beach, CA 90278
Premium
Jura Andrew Hartley
J. Hartley Law Apc
Accident & Injury, Immigration, Motor Vehicle, Personal Injury, General Practice
880 Apollo St
El Segundo, CA 90245
Premium
Brent S. Buchsbaum
Law Offices of Buchsbaum & Haag LLP
Employment,
100 Oceangate Suite 1200
Long Beach, CA 90802
Premium
Alexis Galindo
Curd Galindo & Smith, LLP
Accident & Injury, Civil & Human Rights, Products Liability, Personal Injury, Consumer Rights
301 E Ocean Blvd Suite 1700
Long Beach, CA 90802
Premium
Geoffrey Cleveland Lyon
Lyon Law PC
Employment, Labor Law, Whistleblower, Mediation, State Appellate Practice
3605 Long Beach Blvd Suite 311
Long Beach, CA 90807
Premium
Jennifer Elizabeth Larossa
Morrison, Larossa, Price & Iturrioz
Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Divorce,
3711 Blvd Suite 801
Long Beach, CA 90807
About Jack
Mr. Esensten is an accomplished lawyer that has over sixty years of legal experience in family matters. He has worked as an owner and managing attorney since starting his firm in 1955.
In addition to his legal experience, he is active in several different associations including the State Bar of California, Los Angeles County Bar Association, American Bar Association and South Bay Bar Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. of which he was the president.
Mr. Esensten graduated from Southwestern University School with a J.D. degree in 1955 and admitted to the California state bar on June 17, 1955. In addition to his legal degree, Mr. Esensten also has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Jack Esensten, JD is an expert on family law.
In addition to his legal experience, he is active in several different associations including the State Bar of California, Los Angeles County Bar Association, American Bar Association and South Bay Bar Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. of which he was the president.
Mr. Esensten graduated from Southwestern University School with a J.D. degree in 1955 and admitted to the California state bar on June 17, 1955. In addition to his legal degree, Mr. Esensten also has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Jack Esensten, JD is an expert on family law.
Please contact me for an initial consultation.
Experience
Owner & Managing Attorney
Law Office of Jack Esensten
1955 - Present
Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274
Admission
California
1955
Education
Southwestern University School of Law
J.D.
1955
Recognitions & Achievements
Associations
-
State Bar of California
-
Los Angeles County Bar Association
-
South Bay Bar Association Of Los Angeles County, Inc.
-
American Bar Association
Honors / Awards
-
Previous President of the South Bay Bar Association of Los Angeles County, Inc.
-
Member of the California State Bar since .1955
Notable Work
Cases
DAILEY V. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCH. DIST
Plaintiff: Attorney for the plaintiff/appellant, William W. Dailey. Dailey's son Michael was killed on a playground at Gardena High School. The family brought a wrongful death suit against the Los Angeles Unified School District. A verdict was found in favor of the defendants as the plaintiff had failed to establish negligence as the cause for their son's death. The Dailey's appealed this decision. Upon review of the case the appeals court concluded that there was sufficient evidence to support the claims made by the plaintiff. The court found that the trial court erred in their verdict. The judgement was reversed.
1961 case in which said attorney represented the Appellant regarding an original issue over a promissory note in the amount of $30,463.85. Originally, partial summary judgement was entered for the Appellant, however this was set aside in another court hearing. The sole grounds for the order vacating judgment were appellant's failure to appear for the taking of a deposition after proper notice had been served upon him, and appellant's failure on two occasions to appear before the Court, pursuant to court orders which had been communicated to him. The case was remanded.