C. Mark Kiesling, Attorney

Wonderful experience! My 10- and 11-year-old kids and I enjoyed touring the Ohio State Supreme Court this month. The building is not only practical, but historically significant and beautiful in both form and feature. The paintings on the ceilings and walls depict Ohioans’ rich history in trade, industry, and agriculture. Each room tells a story. Both guided and self-guided tours are available. We highly recommend a guided tour with Mason Farr, Civic Education Coordinator.

I am a new resident to Ohio and I just received a ticket in the mail from Newburgh Heights. Traffic cameras seem like a horrible way to stress the community out when the world is already in a bad place. I was having horrible PTSD related symptoms and was taking myself to the hospital. I can't afford an ambulance and an emergency room visit. This is why I was driving. Sure, this doesn't justify doing 77 in a 60, but there are underlining factors that can be explained to a real cop and not a camera. Then you want to impose court fees on someone who is already down on their luck. Your community is lost when you put profits before people. I will do my best to avoid Newburgh Heights at all costs.

First time the guards would not let me in, 2nd time they did. The 11th floor was closed

A nation is diminished when injustice prevails and discretionary judgment benefits only a select few. Just Days Before the SC declined intervention on behalf of the defendant subjecting him to further duress & injury, the shameless, Medina child support office sent the defendant a notice of confiscation of his earnings of 120,000.00. 2018-2019 while deployed the defendant filed misconduct complaints against four Medina court/Atty officials with the disciplinary ethics office. The community has a history of racism, blatant and subtle. Upon confirming the defendant was a black man the officials proceeded to use unethical sharp practice to deliberately misstate the defendant’s income w/o expenses resulting in an improper 3400.00 + 545.00 (3700)monthly spousal support order. Without caution the officials held hearings w/o the defendant present. Parties Married 2014, Separated 2016, -0- children, no house, GI bill part household income from 2014-2016. How is such an award conceivably lawful? The spousal order is not in accordance with ANY known federal or state law or spousal support calculation statue. The Injury imposed upon the defendant is not frivolous it’s MAJOR, his substantial rights have been freely violated while his due process right to a fair hearing to challenge the court’s defective order, abuse of discretion, prejudicial errors in the court’s procedures and its faulty interpretation of the law have been repeatedly impeded and blocked. The appeal is of great public importance for divorced men everywhere facing the confiscation of their earnings at the whim of a system of invented standards of prejudice. The defendant is now the target and subject of continuous legal harassment. So Let’s see what the Supreme Judge has to say about this form of injustice.

Completely missed that a final appealable order wasn't a final appealable order because they're idiots.