Charles M. Wynn Law Offices
Bankruptcy & Debt, Estate, Corporate, Guardianships & Conservatorships, Reorganization
Firm Size:
1
Charles M. Wynn Law Offices
Main Office
4436 Clinton Street
Marianna, FL 32446
Office Hours
Monday- Thursday 8:00AM-5:00PM, Friday 8:00AM-12:00PM
Other Locations
30.776252,-85.226226
Lawyers
Charles Milton Wynn
Estate Planning, Trusts, Wills & Probate, Power of Attorney,
About Law Firm
FLORIDA BANKRUPTCY LAWYER
If you are considering filing bankruptcy, it is important to have the right Florida Bankruptcy Attorney on your side and Charles Wynn is the right attorney for you. Mr. Wynn has been practicing Bankruptcy Law for over 33 years, and is familiar in all types of cases concerning Bankruptcy, including the individual Bankruptcy choices, Chapter 7 and Chapter 13, and the Business choice of Chapter 11. He also has experience with the lesser known Chapter 12 Bankruptcy for family farmers and fishermen. Whatever your situation, Mr. Wynn will be able to assist you. He will provide guidance that is personally geared to your unique situation, whether that involves filing Bankruptcy or avoiding Bankruptcy. He has your best interest at heart.
If you are considering filing bankruptcy, it is important to have the right Florida Bankruptcy Attorney on your side and Charles Wynn is the right attorney for you. Mr. Wynn has been practicing Bankruptcy Law for over 33 years, and is familiar in all types of cases concerning Bankruptcy, including the individual Bankruptcy choices, Chapter 7 and Chapter 13, and the Business choice of Chapter 11. He also has experience with the lesser known Chapter 12 Bankruptcy for family farmers and fishermen. Whatever your situation, Mr. Wynn will be able to assist you. He will provide guidance that is personally geared to your unique situation, whether that involves filing Bankruptcy or avoiding Bankruptcy. He has your best interest at heart.
Call today to learn more about my fee structure.
Notable Work
Cases
10. Henderson Signs v. Florida Dept. Of Transp., 397 So. 2d 769
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., May 04, 1981) (No. WW-15)
11. Reddoch v. Department of Transp., 390 So. 2d 818
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Dec 04 1980) (No. 00-213)
12. Melvin v. Melvin, 391 So. 2d 691
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Nov 07, 1980) (No. PP-40)
13. In re Jackson, 169 B.R. 742
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Jun 17, 1984) (No. 93-02222)
14. In re Speights, 131 B.R. 205, 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 31
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Aug, 1991) (No. 91-07068)
15. In re Cannon, 93 B.R. 746, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 593, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72, 547
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Oct 26, 1988) (No. 88-04055) 00
16. In re Pape, 7 B.R. 443, Bankr. L. Rep. P 67, 878
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Dec 03, 1980) (No., 80-02026)
17. In re Burkhart, 94, B.R. 724
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Aug 24 1988) (No. 87-04676)
18 Fla. L. Weekly
Fed. B 407, September 22, 2005, Decided
18. In Re Miles, 96, B.R. 348, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 912, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72, 703
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Feb 01, 1989) (No. 88-02177)
19. In re Dabbs, 128 B.R. 307
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Feb 22, 1991) (No. 89-02279)
2. Gonzales v. State, 536 So. 2d 1128, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Dec 21, 1988) (No. 88-2044)
20. In re Smith, 98 B.R. 44, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72, 841
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Mar 27, 1989) (No. 88-02156)
21. In re Franck, CASE NO.: 09-50616-LMK, CHAPTER: 11, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, PANAMA CITY DIVISION, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4488; 23 Fla. L. Weekly
Fed. B 251, November 10, 2011, Decided
22. In re Reams Case No.: 01-70935-LMK, Chapter 12 , UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2122; 18 Fla. L. Weekly
Fed. B 407, September 22, 2005, Decided
23 Fla. L. Weekly
Fed. B 251, November 10, 2011, Decided
22. In re Reams Case No.: 01-70935-LMK, Chapter 12 , UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2122
3. Food >n Fun, Inc. V. Department of Transp., 493 So. 2d 23, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1654
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Jul 28, 1986) (No. BK-135, BK-136, BK-137)
4. Department of Transp. V. Durden, 471 So. 2d 1271, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 317
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Apr 25 1985) (No. AX-282)
5. Baker v. Peddie, 467 So. 2d 821. 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1059
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Apr 25, 1985) (No. AX-282)
6. Gause v. Fist Bank of Marianna, 457 So. 2d 582
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Oct 12, 1984) (No. AZ-88)
7. Holland v. Holland, 453 So. 2d 157
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Jul 18, 1984) (No. AW-206)
8. Gause v . First Bank of Marianna, 442 So. 2d 1062
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Dec 16, 1983) (No. AT-199)
9. Reddoch v. Deparment of Transp., 406 So. 2d 1099
(Fla., Nov 05, 1981) (No. 60057, 60058)
RESULTS/REPORTED CASES
1. Clark v. Gochenaur, 623 So. 2d 561, 18 Fla. L. Weekly D1836
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Aug 16, 1993) (No. 93-126)
RESULTS/REPORTED CASES
1. Clark v. Gochenaur, 623 So. 2d 561, 18 Fla. L. Weekly D1836
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Aug 16, 1993) (No. 93-126)
2. Gonzales v. State, 536 So. 2d 1128, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Dec 21, 1988) (No. 88-2044)
3. Food >n Fun, Inc. V. Department of Transp., 493 So. 2d 23, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1654
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Jul 28, 1986) (No. BK-135, BK-136, BK-137)
4. Department of Transp. V. Durden, 471 So. 2d 1271, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 317
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Apr 25 1985) (No. AX-282)
5. Baker v. Peddie, 467 So. 2d 821. 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1059
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Apr 25, 1985) (No. AX-282)
6. Gause v. Fist Bank of Marianna, 457 So. 2d 582
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Oct 12, 1984) (No. AZ-88)
7. Holland v. Holland, 453 So. 2d 157
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Jul 18, 1984) (No. AW-206)
8. Gause v . First Bank of Marianna, 442 So. 2d 1062
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Dec 16, 1983) (No. AT-199)
9. Reddoch v. Deparment of Transp., 406 So. 2d 1099
(Fla., Nov 05, 1981) (No. 60057, 60058)
10. Henderson Signs v. Florida Dept. Of Transp., 397 So. 2d 769
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., May 04, 1981) (No. WW-15)
11. Reddoch v. Department of Transp., 390 So. 2d 818
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Dec 04 1980) (No. 00-213)
12. Melvin v. Melvin, 391 So. 2d 691
(Fla. App. 1 Dist., Nov 07, 1980) (No. PP-40)
13. In re Jackson, 169 B.R. 742
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Jun 17, 1984) (No. 93-02222)
14. In re Speights, 131 B.R. 205, 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 31
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Aug, 1991) (No. 91-07068)
15. In re Cannon, 93 B.R. 746, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 593, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72, 547
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Oct 26, 1988) (No. 88-04055) 00
16. In re Pape, 7 B.R. 443, Bankr. L. Rep. P 67, 878
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Dec 03, 1980) (No., 80-02026)
17. In re Burkhart, 94, B.R. 724
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Aug 24 1988) (No. 87-04676)
18. In Re Miles, 96, B.R. 348, 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 912, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72, 703
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Feb 01, 1989) (No. 88-02177)
19. In re Dabbs, 128 B.R. 307
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Feb 22, 1991) (No. 89-02279)
20. In re Smith, 98 B.R. 44, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72, 841
(Bankr. N.D. Fla., Mar 27, 1989) (No. 88-02156)
21. In re Franck, CASE NO.: 09-50616-LMK, CHAPTER: 11, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, PANAMA CITY DIVISION, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4488
Reviews
I want to say when I came to meet with Michael Wynn, His approach with my concerns were where I could understand and came up with a conservative plan. I was impressed with his professional knowledge as he gave me incite to my particular case. All the firm was so friendly.
If I could give no stars it would better describe my experience with this firm. There are a number of reasons I had a bad experience with this firm. 1. I hired them in February, got them the paperwork in March, but the case wasn't filed until June and wasn't discharged until December. NOT the time frame Michael promised us when we initially met with him. 2. Michael was our attorney, who promised we wouldn't have to spend any money even after calling and asking if we were allowed to do certain things, and we ended up having to pay almost $3,000 out of our pockets. 3. Gave us a court date, when we showed Michael sent another lawyer in his place who knew nothing about our case. Had to go back again because we didn't have some documentation that he should've told us we needed. So they set another court date, when we showed up, they didn't even have us on the docket. 4. It's been two years since our discharge date and we are still dealing with repercussions of Michael's errors. Things he never made us aware of, didn't warn us about, or things that he promised wouldn't happen, but did. Do not recommend this firm at all.
I honestly don't understand his way of doing business. I guess it's true that lawyers really do have a different moral code than the rest of us.
Veryb freindly staff very helpful
They redid our wills and our trust fund made it very easy for us