Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP
Lawyers
Alison J. Bell
Landlord-Tenant, Litigation, Leisure, Federal, Federal
Cara L Cookson
David W. M. Conard
Land Use & Zoning,
Eric M. Knudsen
Tax, Commercial Real Estate, Corporate, Business Organization, Business Organization
Erin Miller Heins
Employment, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate, Other, Other
Hobart F Popick
General Practice,
James T Deweese
General Practice,
Justin G Sherman
Personal Injury, Environmental Law Other, Litigation,
Manisha Munshi
General Practice,
Mark L. Sperry
Commercial Real Estate, Litigation, Estate Planning, Transactions, Transactions
Robert Peter Nessen
General Practice,
Susan M. Murray
Federal Appellate Practice, Collaborative Law, Family Law, Gay & Lesbian Rights, Gay & Lesbian Rights
Suzanna C. Miller
General Practice,
Reviews
Matthew A Zidovsky is an AMAZING attorney. Alway's responds within 24 hours, has been more than understanding and flexible with payment arrangements (after the initial retainer of course) he has been extremely detailed and and right on top of things the entire time. I recommend him to anyone that is looking for a lawyer that gets the job done and is 100% straight forward! I thank Vince Todd, another lawyer at this firm, for connecting me with him. Vince was my lawyer for a custody dispute (which we won) and also did wonderful work!
I Was Pushed Aside Multiple Times By My Attorney For A "More Important" Case. This Added Several Calendar Calls at The Courthouse. A Substitute Attorney From LS&W Was Sent Each Time, But They Knew Little or Nothing About Me or My Case. A Subsequent Calendar Call Was Added After Each Appearance . This Added Several Months To The Resolution of My Issues. And I Was Billed For ALL The Extra Calendar Calls, I Was Even Billed For Mileage When A Substitute Attorney Came In From Their Middlebury Office. By The Time My Attorney Made An Appearance , I Was So Frustrated That I Was Hasty in My Choices To Resolve The Court Issues. With Less Than Full Regards To the Outcome on My own Behalf. This is Not The Caliber Expertise That I Have Seen in The Past or What I Expected
Peter Langrock was to have represented me in two cases, a civil case where I was being sued frivolously, and a criminal case of “he said she said” brought on by the same parties. He delayed the criminal case against my wishes so that he could bring a motion on the civil before Judge Allen Chever, whom he leaked to me was his client. The civil case was a clear cut dismissal, not a lucrative trial for a lawyer. The plaintiffs were trying to unilaterally modify my deed -- it would invalidate deeds. After leaking that Cheever was Langrock's client, Peter Langrock had me waive my right to a jury in the criminal case involving the same plaintiffs as the civil which put both cases in the hands of his client, the judge. But, at criminal trial, Langrock called me down off the witness stand WITHOUT CROSS EXAMINING ME, his own client in a he said she said. This is so negligent that I must be public about my case. In his closing defense, Langrock then added that he wished we were in Scotland where the laws were different. I was falsely convicted. Then, Allen Chever ruled against my deed, and instead of granting summary judgment in my favor, he denied the motion which was to force a costly trial for me and a lucrative one for his lawyer, Peter Langrock. I fired Peter and Fritz, his son now on the ABA Board of Governors in Vermont. I was able to represent myself on the civil suit and win without trial because I had a deed that could not be altered, and a new judge took the case. I was able to do better without attorney than having been represented by Peter Langrock and Fritz Langrock. I had a long standing post on Google about this and it was recently cleared and Langrock was given a five star rating again.
Kaplan & Kaplan will do better work than this group...
Everyone was very nice hoping for a good out come.