Law Office Of Gregory S. Simmons

Premium Member Premium
Law Office Of Gregory S. Simmons

Law Office Of Gregory S. Simmons

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Personal Injury

Main Office

P.O. Box 664
Helotes, TX 78023

Office Hours

Monday - Friday 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Other Locations

Lawyers

About Law Firm

Gregory S. Simmons, located in San Antonio, Texas, is a friendly, highly motivated, and effective attorney committed to assisting clients who need legal guidance for matters having to do with criminal defense in misdemeanor and felonies, ranging from drug crimes, DWI (driving while intoxicated) to theft and assault.

Greg Simmons, listens to your situation requiring legal assistance, offers concrete advice, and gives you the kind of support that is action-based and provides the empowerment you need to find resolution. Get the knowledge you need to have a positive effect on your case by meeting with attorney Greg Simmons.

We provide effective legal advice and counsel that is grounded in reality rather than emotionalism. We understand that emotions can flare and change in a case. Our attorney maintains an objective stance to provide a firm base of support as you move through your case proceedings to a brighter future for you and for your loved ones. In matters of criminal defense, lawyer Greg Simmons offers his knowledge and experience to help keep you informed of your rights as well as provide options so you can make more informed choices about your future.

Contact us today to schedule an initial consultation.

Free Consultation.

Notable Work

Cases

HOOG WATSON v. GUADALUPE COUNTY TEXAS Before BARKSDALE, DENNIS and ELROD, Circuit Judges. Gregory S. Simmons (argued), Seguin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Michael A. Shaunessy (argued), Sheri Richie Hunter, Special Counsel, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

The plaintiff in this case, Suzanne Hoog-Watson, seeks redress for the actions of county officials who, fearing for the safety of Hoog-Watson's dogs and cats, conducted a warrantless search of her property and seized her animals. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants by relying upon the principles of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and prosecutorial immunity. Hoog-Watson appeals. We reverse and remand.