Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property
Firm Size:
1
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Lawyers
Amy Celeste Van Eepoel
General Practice,
Christopher Newton Bolinger
General Practice,
Emily Sauter
General Practice, Litigation,
James L. Mcginnis
General Practice,
Keith MacMillan
General Practice,
Mary Josephine Morry
Lawsuit & Dispute, Intellectual Property, General Practice,
Patricia Shatynski
General Practice,
Susan Laurel Hess
General Practice,
Yong Zhao
General Practice,
Reviews
The comments referring to animal testing must be towards Merck the former tenant of the building. Unicom is a tech conglomerate who just came to the area and has plans to bring 2000+ jobs to the area. Although, only about 100 people currently work there on the regular. This company has the chance to change Hunterdon county for the better and everyone who lives here should hope they succeed.
The facilities are powered by a large solar array making this one of the greenest technology parks out side of CA. However, despite that they are still testing on animals for none essential products which puts this otherwise excellent science and technology park in the one star ranking.
I paid $16 for the Freeze Away Kit and I have never seen anything so useless in my life. I am a retired senior, vet and all I did was make a donation to Merck. The product is a farce.
While it is not a place where the general public would go to, the complex is beautiful. At the time of this writing, only a small group of Unicom employees regularly work at this location.
major abuser of animals for its drugs - no need for these tests since cell tests can be done. white collar crime imo to abuse animals