Morris & Schorsch Pc

Lawyers
Lee Anne Morris
Commercial Bankruptcy, Litigation, General Practice,
Reviews

My critique is precipitated by a significant lack of professionalism I have observed in his practice, both in terms of his interactions with clients and his approach to legal tasks. The efficiency with which Attorney Schorsch handles legal tasks leaves much to be desired. A proposal that should ideally have taken a week to draft has spanned over six weeks under his direction, and it has yet to be completed. When queried about the progress and expected completion date, he tends only to offer excuses instead of concrete timelines. On a notable occasion, a provided deadline was missed without any reasonable explanation or subsequent revision of the timeline. This disregard for efficiency and punctuality is of grave concern, as it portrays a lack of respect for client's time and the professional standards of the legal field. Moreover, I spent an inordinate amount of time - ten hours, to be precise - in Attorney Schorsch's office, during which he exhibited a propensity for excessive, non-constructive conversation. His conduct in this situation leads me to question the value and appropriateness of his time usage, especially considering the charges associated with such meetings. In the interest of full disclosure, I must note that I am not a client of Attorney Schorsch. Instead, my interaction with him came in the capacity of opposing counsel. While this might raise questions about bias, I believe the need for professionalism and efficiency in the legal profession transcends any personal affiliations, and this critique is grounded in that perspective.