Norman A Sammut, Esq., P.C.

No response. Nassau County's legal affairs folks must all be in a frenzy over the latest exposure of their collective behaviors. From the few things I've seen, "rules for thee and not for me" mentality is on full display for all to see ! The thin blue line can only withstand so much pressure ! Maybe law enforcement in general might consider revisiting the true meaning of "Protect & Serve". Good Cops are hard to find, why let a few bad apples, especially those at the top, spoil the whole damn department ?

Writing a review without having visited a business establishment simply to harm a business owner based on alleged behavior I do not condone. The line is not so clear when the individual being reviewed is Business, a public figure such as a mayor or in this case a judge. It’s my understanding that this judge was asked to Grant, orders of protection (these are typically issued to protect Individuals from predators or Partners in abusive relationships). To approximately eight police officers, because a man with a video camera came into their precinct. I’m not sure how many other ways One can look at this, however, the individual in question who they are this judge is protecting a police officers from. Is a video journalist Who has a practice and has not been shown to have ever been abusive to any law-enforcement officers either physically or verbally? So most jurist would look at the fax prior to issuing in order or injunction in this case, in order of protection, and they ask, does this individual have a history of harming, or threatening others the individual in this case being a journalist answer is two our understanding The answer is no over a long period of years so I am now concerned with why the judge would issue an order of protection law enforcement officers when there has been no history of threat or menace by this individual it seems fairly clear that this judge is either very inexperienced or… United States we tend to air on the side of leniency, and there have been many many many cases where it seems that an individual has been perceived to have been threatening others, and the judge has not provided or rule on order of protection or law enforcement or prosecutors others in the judicial arena. This should send shivers up to spine certainly in this case for this individual a Mr. Reyes, but to all others who have been or will be in this juris courtroom, concern that this judge shall treat with equanimity those who come before him have not inquired as to how long judge? Sam has sat on this bench or what his qualifications are, but I would certainly pay close attention if I were to be an individual before jurist Sammut be he handling my case. I hope that this individual gets a good hard look by the judicial regulatory agency in New York. This is a nerving say the least and frightening. I would posture to say that with time a more fuller story, a more complete history of the individuals involved will be shown So that citizens of the state and the poor individuals that will be brought before this judge Will have hopefully, the opportunity to receive fair, and impartial treatment. And I wish Mr. Reyes, the individual for whom this case came both to my screen, Into my attention Receives the Nut only the fair treatment, but a second look at this juris, and his partiality shall we say who may now have reason to have concern of hearing their case with an impartial and fair treatment. Yes, my emotion would move me towards reading this one star review from all that I have gathered publicly, at least. I am providing this individual a star of grace shall we say, for if facts are not, as they have been conferred or shown exactly or shall we say extenuating circumstances?

Corrupt judge. Predatory and retaliatory judicial practices, constitutional violator. Disgusting individual