Law Offices of Bradford J. Sullivan
Criminal, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Animal Bite, Wrongful Death, Employment and Business Litigation
Attorneys as counselors providing objective advice for reasonable fees.
Attorneys as counselors providing objective advice for reasonable fees.
Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Car Accident, Animal Bite, Animal Bite
Please contact us for an initial consultation.
Hathaway v. Hominik
Outcome:
Settled for $150,000
Description:
Head on collision motor vehicle accident. My client sustained head and shoulder injuries.
Peterson v. Tenney
Outcome:
Settlement $975,000
Description:
Facts: On June 24, 2012, Peterson was riding a 1983 Honda Shadow motorcycle he purchased and picked up within the previous 24 hours from a private seller. The motorcycle was not insured, was unregistered and Peterson did not possess a valid motorcycle endorsement for his operator’s license. Peterson was traveling southbound on Pond Meadow Road, Westbrook, CT and Tenney was traveling northbound in a Honda Pilot SUV. Tenney made a left turn in front of Peterson. Peterson was unable to avoid the colliding with the SUV. Peterson’s face smashed into the right rear window of the SUV lacerating his face and fracturing his left orbital bone. Peterson’s right leg was pinned between the motorcycle and the SUV resulting in severe fractures to his tibia and fibula, which required multiple surgeries, including skin grafts, to repair. Peterson requires right knee surgery and an Achilles tendon reconstruction procedure. His prognosis is guarded. Peterson has not worked since June 24, 2012. Loss of income of approximately $430,000 after reduced for present value and approximately $325,000 in medical bills as of date of settlement. Tenney was issued a moving violation and Peterson was issued a summons for failure to register and insure. There was a GL policy of $250,000 and excess umbrella policy of $1,000,000. Plaintiff’s contentions and causes of action: Tenney was negligent or reckless when she failed to yield the right of way to Peterson, when she turned left in front of his motorcycle and cut him off. Tenney caused the collision. Peterson’s wife Dawn claimed a loss of consortium. Unusual legal issues or interesting trial techniques or happenings: Plaintiff’s counsel submitted a thorough demand package and allowed Allstate Insurance Company adjusters to photograph facial and right leg scarring. No offer was forthcoming. Plaintiff’s counsel filed an application for prejudgment remedy attachment seeking attachment of defendant’s assets and father’s assets under Family Car Doctrine. Approximately three weeks before the scheduled first hearing on plaintiffs’ PJR application negotiations with Allstate began. The case was settled per clients’ explicit instructions for less than insurance policy limit after 10-days of negotiations with Allstate.
Soyka v. SNET
Outcome:
Settlement $120,000
Description:
Lineman sustained back injury with surgery.
Sullivan Heiser, LLC Blog | Sullivan heiser & Sweeney | 2014
Attorney Sullivan and his team recently completed a very detailed closing for my brother an I. JGM Restaurant Group LLC purchased Chips Pub III in Clinton. We can not thank them enough for the professionalism, transparency, attention to detail and most of all the constant communication every step of the way. This is the third time I have retained Attorney Sullivan's services, I am proud to have him representing my three restaurants and can't thank him enough for his hard work and dedication. He is a true professional!
Attorney Sullivan has helped me on a few occasions. I will continue to use him for any of my legal needs. I highly recommend him.
Attorney Sullivan made me feel very comfortable in knowing that he is taking care of my challenge for my family. I trust him and believe in him because I know he is a highly skilled litigator. He is very easy to work with and he has a passion for doing the right thing. A really great guy!
Everyone comes across a time in their business where you question if the situation was handled correctly or not. I was one that needed the guiding hand in a situation and Brad Sullivan came in to help rectify the issue in the utmost professional manner. I felt confident in his choices and at all times I was updated with the next step on how to move forward. Brad Sullivan will not disappoint you.
A friend gave me the name of Attorney Sullivan. Needing legal advice is intimidating but this was not the case here. He is very professional, knowledgeable and also down to earth. He listened without making me feel like I had to hurry, and asked questions allowing me to elaborate so he was in complete understanding. He validated my issue and I was surprised to learn there is a legal term to describe it. All my options were explained and as many others commented in the past, he is very honest and has amazing integrity. He said he would fight for me but did not feel that it was a case that would win and he did not want to take my money knowing what the outcome would be. He advised the direction that he felt was best and it did work out as was said. I would call him in a heartbeat if I were in need of a lawyer again. I cannot thank him enough!!