Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein Llp
Lawyers
Amanda B. Zifchak
Lawsuit & Dispute, International, Accident & Injury, General Practice,
Aubrey Elain Riccardi
Business, Real Estate, General Practice,
Bryce E. May
General Practice,
Daniel Joseph Slatz
General Practice,
Darryl Evan Strutton
General Practice,
Dena Copulsky Kaufman
Government, Lawsuit & Dispute,
Douglas Craig Taus
Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury, Criminal,
Erica Dawn Vitanza
Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal,
Erik Zaratin
Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, International, Estate, Estate
Evan Scott Zimmermann
Business, Lawsuit & Dispute, General Practice,
Harvey L. Goldstein
Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal,
Humbert V. Maggiacomo
General Practice,
J Ted Donovan
Bankruptcy & Debt, General Practice,
Jay Edward Simens
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law,
John Patrick Hogan
Real Estate, General Practice,
Lisa C. Nasiak
General Practice,
Mark A. Lopez
Business, International, General Practice,
Matthew Ethan Hearle
Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal,
Michael Benjamin Podolsky
Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal,
Neal M. Rosenbloom
Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury,
Neil Ian Albstein
General Practice,
Robert Jude Paparella
General Practice,
Stewart Adam Wolf
General Practice,
Reviews
They are good lawyers, but their billing is a fantasy. The bills are padded with outright fluff. They spend more time talking amongst themselves and billing you for it, than they do actual work. I would never use them again, look elsewhere.
I would give a zero star review, but it's not an option. I was involved in a landlord tenant dispute this past year and was referred to Goldberg Weprin, specifically Mr. Kevin Nash, the "pit bull" of L and T litigation. He promptly and avariciously (greedily) accepted our $10,000 retainer fee and assured us that we indeed had a legitimate and defensible case against our landlord. After minimal motion responses and submissions, and virtually NO personal contact with him Mr. Nash was challenged with a conflict of interest by the landlord plaintiff attorney as having performed "some" work for the landlord a full 10 years ago. I am told by my eventual representing attorneys that the statute on conflict is 7 years, maybe that's inaccurate?? Anyway, Mr. Nash decided that he wanted no part of arguing the conflict and submitted to the court a motion to recuse himself from the case, AT OUR EXPENSE OF COURSE. When asked for a refund of part of our retainer Mr. Nash returned a ridiculously trumped up bill that laughingly reported that we, in fact owed him $5000! This firm may carry a reputation, however, there is a threshold at which "you get what you pay for" morphs into "taking advantage of a client and ripping them off."
Make no mistake these guys are the best in the business
Great lawyer's