Sippel Law Firm PLLC

Mark Sippel was recommended to me by bankruptcy and foreclosure attorney Diane Drain (the Phoenix area lawyer with all the helpful YouTube videos). Picture small town, faith-based country doctor or lawyer. The practice is not so big that you feel like just another case, Mark and his team, especially Dawn are kind, professional and thorough. Mark is caring, humorous, and attentive. Responds best after initial consult via email and in a timely manner.

SUPER NASTY PEOPLE These people are nasty, super nasty. I thought I was calling the local PD when I mistakenly dialed the wrong phone number and was actually calling Sippel Law. (their phone numbers are only one digit different) The person who answered the phone at Sippel Law was very rude. I said, 'I am calling to report a radical driver.' She responded, ' We don't handle criminal cases.' I told her, 'Put the watch commander on the phone.' She just put me on hold (she knows I dialed the wrong number and I am trying to call the local PD). After ten minutes on hold, I realized, I was not on hold with someone at the local PD, rather, I was on hold with someone at Sippel Law - who is gaming me on hold - and I had dialed the wrong phone number. I believe, she thought she could game me and there would be nothing I could do about it - pathetic. Apparently, she is suffering from a severe case of narcissism and gaming people is her source of narcissistic supply. it's truly shocking of how rude and inconsiderate people are here in Kingman. If you cannot answer the phone in a professional manner and then choose to game the caller, you obviously lack in common decency and are probably extremely narcissistic. AVOID AT ALL COSTS ! ! ! ~ Response to Owner ~ This review is not an old post - it was posted just a few months ago, on July 12, 2017. Mr. Sippel claims are just more of the same (more deflection). Mr. Sippel is having a very hard time dealing with the truth - it seems to escape him all the time. Now, Mr. Sippel has a whole new set of excuses, much different than his first response. He now claims that it was a temporary receptionist that is at fault (I seriously doubt his new story - no temp could be that nasty and get a job). That's funny, in his first response he claimed it was due to a bad phone system and misc. Which is it? Mr. Sippel's first response: 'It is difficult to address problems and people who were not even clients of the firm -- calling because our phone number was similar to the police department -- It is even worse in the midst of power outages and phone systems that someone was lost on hold -- and was told we cannot help them--I am sorry for Mr. Ken C but there is little we can do, and it has no bearing on how we treat our clients.' All of Mr. Sippel's excuses listed above have failed to address the issue at hand, and all he can do is deflect from the subject and deflect from the truth - absolutely pathetic.

Personal service