Fort Hancock DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Fort Hancock DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Fort Hancock Criminal lawyers.

Stephanie Ann Osburn

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

636 John Paul St, Canutillo, TX 79938

Jonathan Heith Huerta

Family Law, Criminal, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11601 Pellicano Dr, Canutillo, TX 79936

Jonathan H. Huerta

Family Law, Criminal, Insurance, Personal Injury, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11601 Pellicano Dr, Canutillo, TX 79936

Paul Joseph Escobar

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

1030 N Zaragoza Rd, Canutillo, TX 79907

Dave Robert Contreras

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

11692 John Weir Dr, Canutillo, TX 79936

William J. Ellis

Family Law, Criminal, Gay & Lesbian Rights, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

3850 Justice Rd, Canutillo, TX 79930

Philip E. Mullin

Military, Clean Air Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Wills

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

1790 N Lee Trevino Dr, Canutillo, TX 79936

Richard Contreras

Administrative Law, Government, Criminal, International, Consumer Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

2150 Trawood Dr, Canutillo, TX 79935

Felix Saldivar

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

3160 N Lee Trevino Dr, Canutillo, TX 79936

David J. Ferrell

Civil Rights, Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Administrative Law, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10420 Montwood Dr, Canutillo, TX 79935

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

... We reverse. 874 The Controversy [1]. On June 24, 2003, an assistant district attorney in Montgomery County presented an information in the trial court charging appellant with misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI). The ...

Peavey v. State

... At the penalty stage of the trial, appellant pleaded "true" to the three prior felony convictions alleged for the enhancement of punishment, including: a felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction in 2003 in the same district court; convictions for possession of a controlled ...

Brown v. State

... Brown was placed in custody and charged with DWI-Misdemeanor Repetition. ... 2000). B. Applicable Law. Under Texas law, a person commits DWI "if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place." Tex. Penal Code Ann. Â§ 49.04 (Vernon 2008). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Fort Hancock DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Stephanie Ann Osburn

Jonathan Heith Huerta

Jonathan H. Huerta

Paul Joseph Escobar

Dave Robert Contreras

William J. Ellis

Philip E. Mullin

Richard Contreras

Felix Saldivar

David J. Ferrell

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HABEAS CORPUS

BATTERY

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

JURY NULLIFICATION

PLEA BARGAIN

INTERROGATION

MOTION IN LIMINE

DIRECTED VERDICT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

Peavey v. State

Brown v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details