Grand County, UT Criminal Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Smith
About | Practice Areas
Greg Smith and Associates
7324 Union Park Ave Suite 101 Midvale, UT 84047Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving The State of Utah

We've successfully resolved thousands of criminal defense and other cases, and we can take your call now!

800-925-8751
1. Gregory Smith Midvale, UT
  Attorney at Law - UT, 1993
  Brigham Young University J.D. 1993
2. AboutGreg Smith and Associates
  Over 25 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Grand Criminal lawyer.
Below are all Grand lawyers.

Christina R. Sloan

Real Estate, Industry Specialties

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

76 S. Main Street, Moab, UT 84532

Judith Elaine Frank

General Practice

Status: Retired Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

1251 E Holyoak Ln, Moab, UT 84532

Robert Douglas Sherlock

General Practice

Status: Retired Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

2185 Buena Vista Dr, Moab, UT 84532

Autumn R Fitzgerald

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Adoption, Divorce

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

285 S 400 E, Moab, UT 84532

Deborah D Blackburn

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

150 E. Center St., Moab, UT 84532

Cas M White

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

Moab, UT 84532

Keith A Fitzgerald

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

285 S. 400 East, Moab, UT 84532

Happy J Morgan

Traffic, Dispute Resolution, Health Care Other, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

8 South 100 East, Moab, UT 84532

Sandra J. Bartell

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

Moab, UT 84532

Steven Glenn Byers

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

593 E Center St, Moab, UT 84532

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

... 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). It is initially justified if a police officer has a reasonable suspicion, prior to the stop, that a person is engaging in, or has engaged in, criminal behavior. See id.; Utah Code Ann. ... 2. Details About the Observed Criminal Conduct. ...

State v. Lane

... 4 On July 15, 2005, criminal charges were filed against Lane, including two counts of negligent homicide, a class A misdemeanor. ... 16 A victim is not a party to a criminal case and is not afforded the right to appeal the dismissal of a criminal judgment. ...

State v. Valdez

... BILLINGS, Judge: Â¶ 1 Defendant Patrick Henry Valdez was charged in five different informations based on separate criminal episodes with two second degree felonies, four third degree felonies, and seven misdemeanors, primarily related to various burglaries. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Grand County, UT Criminal Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Greg Smith and Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christina R. Sloan

Judith Elaine Frank

Robert Douglas Sherlock

Autumn R Fitzgerald

Deborah D Blackburn

Cas M White

Keith A Fitzgerald

Happy J Morgan

Sandra J. Bartell

Steven Glenn Byers

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

HABEAS CORPUS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ACTUS REUS

BURDEN OF PROOF

CORPUS DELECTI

SELF-INCRIMINATION

HOMICIDE

BAIL

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Salt Lake City v. Bench

State v. Lane

State v. Valdez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details