Grants Pass DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Sean Flaherty
About | Practice Areas
Keches Law Group
122 Dean Street Taunton, MA 02780» view map
Social Security, Personal Injury, Workers Comp.
Protecting Your Rights

Our team of experienced personal injury attorneys has over 130 years of combined experience representing individuals and families injured due to the negligence of others.

800-713-8650
1. Sean Flaherty Taunton, MA
  Attorney at Law - MA, 2006
  New England School of Law J.D.
2. AboutKeches Law Group
  We are attorneys that care.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Social Security
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Grants Pass DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Grants Pass Criminal lawyers.

Christopher D. Mecca

Wills & Probate, Estate Planning, Criminal, Personal Injury, Estate

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

245 NW B St, Grants Pass, OR 97526

John E Reade

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

231 NW B Street, Grants Pass, OR 97526

Peter Joseph Carini

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 32 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

11 North Central Street, Medford, OR 97501

Richard B Thierolf

Federal Appellate Practice, Estate Planning, Criminal, Collection, Landlord-Tenant

Status: Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

2 N Oakdale Ave, Medford, OR 97501

Robert M. Stone

Real Estate, Immigration, Trusts, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

19 S Orange St, Medford, OR 97501

Larry B Workman

Criminal, Banking & Finance

Status: Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

334 S Grape St, Medford, OR 97501

John P Eckrem

Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Divorce

Status:

CONTACT

700 East Main St., Medford, OR 97504

Bryan E Blodgett

Transportation & Shipping, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

915 W 10th Street, Medford, OR 97501

Gregory M Abel

Civil Rights, Estate Planning, Contract, Criminal, Commercial Real Estate

Status:

CONTACT

1818 E McAndrews Rd, Medford, OR 97504

Jamie L Hazlett

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

910 E Main St, Medford, OR 97504

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

184 P.3d 1182 (2008). 220 Or. App. 38. STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay Lynn KRUSE, Defendant-Appellant. D055973M, D060612T, A132038 (Control), A132039. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted January 4, 2008. Decided May 14, 2008. ...

State v. Machuca

227 P.3d 729 (2010). 347 Or. 644. STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Thomas Gregory MACHUCA, Respondent on Review. (CC 050647097; CA A133362; SC S057910). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted December 16, 2009. ...

Prior v. Department of Revenue

... [2]. In her Complaint, Plaintiff asserts that the Department is in error in withholding the tax refund to pay for her "husband's DUI[,] [because] I have be[en] separated from him for 6 y[ea]rs and have nothing to do with his affairs or finances." [3] (Ptf's Compl at 1, Sec. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Grants Pass DUI-DWI Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Keches Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christopher D. Mecca

John E Reade

Peter Joseph Carini

Richard B Thierolf

Robert M. Stone

Larry B Workman

John P Eckrem

Bryan E Blodgett

Gregory M Abel

Jamie L Hazlett

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

NOLO CONTENDERE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

INTERROGATION

ASSAULT

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

HABEAS CORPUS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kruse

State v. Machuca

Prior v. Department of Revenue

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS