Greenwood Discrimination Lawyer, Virginia


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Harry Robert Yates

Premises Liability, Construction, Disability, Products Liability
Status:  In Good Standing           

J. Robert Brame

Employee Rights, Employment, Religious Discrimination, Business
Status:  In Good Standing           

Saul Ralph Pearlman

Employment, Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Civil Rights
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Greenwood Discrimination Lawyers and Greenwood Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Winborne v. Virginia Lottery

... 3. Under Bacon v. City of Richmond, 475 F.3d 633 (4th Cir.2007), the Virginia Lottery and its executive director are not liable for the alleged claims of disability discrimination against the Petitioners; and. 4. Pursuant to Bacon, injunctive ...

Hopkins v. Com.

... [3]. The trial court ruled, assuming a prima facie case of discrimination was made, there was "sufficient cause" for the first two strikes based on the Commonwealth's knowledge of the jurors' criminal records. The trial court continued: ...

Hopkins v. Commonwealth

... [2]. The trial court ruled, assuming a prima facie case of discrimination was made, there was "sufficient cause" for the first two strikes based on the Commonwealth's knowledge of the jurors' criminal records. The trial court continued: ...