Grulla Misdemeanor Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Grulla Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Grulla Criminal lawyers.

Jason Charles Honeycutt

Complex Litigation, Federal, Federal Trial Practice, Felony

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4900-B North 10th Street, Mcallen, TX 78504

Servando H. Gonzales

Criminal, Family Law, Insurance, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Professional Arts Building, 818 Pecan Boulevard, Mcallen, TX 78501

Damian C. Orozco

Juvenile Law, Estate Planning, Personal Injury, Family Law, Commercial Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1138 E. Expressway 83, Pharr, TX 78577

Gilberto Falcon

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Personal Injury, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

404 N Britton Ave, Rio Grande City, TX 78582

Minerva Garza

Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

200 E 2Nd St, Rio Grande City, TX 78582

Melisandra Mendoza

Credit & Debt, Family Law, Business & Trade, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

Rio Grande City, TX 78582

Mauro L. Reyna

Commercial Real Estate, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

Penitas, TX 78576

Calixtro Villarreal

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

205 W Main St, Rio Grande City, TX 78582

Juan Antonio Solis

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

110 W 5Th St, Rio Grande City, TX 78582

Flor Estela Flores

Immigration, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

102 N East St, Rio Grande City, TX 78582

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kirkpatrick v. State

... presented its case-in-chief, appellant moved for an instructed verdict on the felony forgery count, asserting that the state had failed to prove felony forgery because it had not alleged or proven any of the elements necessary to make the forgery a felony rather than a misdemeanor ...

Edison v. State

... no authority to defer adjudication and extend his community supervision for two years; the court had no authority to revoke his community supervision because it had expired as a matter of law; he was denied due process because he was convicted of a misdemeanor offense but ...

Ex parte Harrington

... We hold that it is. In this case, applicant contends that habeas corpus lies because his plea was involuntary due to counsel's ineffectiveness in failing to investigate a prior DWI conviction used to enhance applicant's misdemeanor DWI charge to a felony charge. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Grulla Misdemeanor Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jason Charles Honeycutt

Servando H. Gonzales

Damian C. Orozco

Gilberto Falcon

Minerva Garza

Melisandra Mendoza

Mauro L. Reyna

Calixtro Villarreal

Juan Antonio Solis

Flor Estela Flores

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACCOMPLICE

IMPRISON

PROSECUTE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

SELF-DEFENSE

BURDEN OF PROOF

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

SPECIFIC INTENT

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kirkpatrick v. State

Edison v. State

Ex parte Harrington

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details