Howe Juvenile Law Lawyer, Idaho


Steve L. Stephens

Government
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  21 Years

Ralph Leon Savage

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  36 Years

Stephen Blaser

Immigration, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  48 Years

David Newell Parmenter

Government, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  45 Years

Daniel Dean Taylor

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  19 Years

Nathan Dane Rivera

Immigration, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  14 Years

Bryce Craig Lloyd

Lawsuit & Dispute, International, Divorce & Family Law, Business
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  21 Years

Justin B. Oleson

Juvenile Law, Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  23 Years

Manuel Travis Murdoch

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  24 Years

Dalon Esplin

Landlord-Tenant, Patent, Immigration, Pharmaceutical Product
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  46 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Howe Juvenile Law Lawyers and Howe Juvenile Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including DUI-DWI, Expungement, Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime and Traffic attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)
The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)
One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)
A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)
The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)
A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)
An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Doe

... Ken Jorgensen argued. HORTON, Justice. This appeal arises from an order by a juvenile court denying Doe's motion to dismiss the State's petition for a probation violation for lack of jurisdiction. Doe appeals the district court's decision affirming the magistrate's order. ...

In re Doe

... In addition to the charges, the State filed a motion to waive juvenile court jurisdiction over Doe. The 976 juvenile court granted the State's motion and entered an order waiving Doe into adult court. Doe appealed the order to the district court, which affirmed the waiver order. ...

State v. Doe

... petit theft. At the disposition hearing the following month, the magistrate found the Does' daughter to be under the purview of the Juvenile Corrections Act ("JCA") and imposed informal probation on her for her offenses. Because ...