James Sarrail | Burlingame Personal Injury Lawyer
Top Local Lawyers
Jeffrey Ray Windsor
Windsor Prof. Law Corp
Business, Civil Rights, Lawsuit & Dispute, Dispute Resolution, Litigation
177 Bovet Rd Ste. 600
San Mateo, CA 94402
John Peter Shearer
Pierce & Shearer LLP
Employment, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate, Business,
730 Polhemus Rd #101
San Mateo, CA 94402
Robert Gary Cummings
The Law Offices of Robert G. Cummings
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Immigration, Misdemeanor
2000 Broadway St
Redwood City, CA 94063
Christopher Guerrero
The Guerrero Law Firm, APC
Accident & Injury, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, Trucking, Products Liability
350 Townsend St Suite 787
San Francisco, CA 94107
Anna Y Liu
Steven Adair MacDonald & Partners
Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute,
870 Market St Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94102
Steven Adair Macdonald
Steven Adair MacDonald & Partners
Real Estate, Lawsuit, Commercial Real Estate,
870 Market St Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94102
Nathan Verbiscar-Brown
Steven Adair MacDonald & Partners
Real Estate,
870 Market St Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94102
Olivia A. Dopler
Steven Adair MacDonald & Partners
Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate,
870 Market St Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94102
Jethro Sanford Busch
Steven Adair MacDonald & Partners
Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Commercial Real Estate, Litigation,
870 Market Street Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94102
About James
Our friendly and straightforward approach to personal injury and claims gets the best results for our clients. We have learned from years of assisting injured clients that additional stress is unnecessary when our firm recovers maximum compensation.
Call regarding fee structure.
Experience
Sr. Partner
Sarrail, Castillo & Hall, LLP
Present
Burlingame, CA
Admission
California
1969
Education
University of San Francisco School of Law
JD
1968
Recognitions & Achievements
-
California State Bar
Notable Work
Defendant: Attorney for the defendant/respondent, TransAmerica Insurance Company. The plaintiff, George Borg, appealed an adverse judgment in his claim against TransAmerica. He had originally filed a claim for breach of duty to defend under the terms of comprehensive general liability policy. The appellant argued that the trial court erred in their determination that the defendant had no duty to defend the lawsuit because the encroachment was created prior to the effective date of the insurance policy. After review of the original case and decision as well as the insurance policy purchased by the appellant, the appeals court agreed with the appellant. They found that the court had erred in their decision and it was ordered that the judgement be reversed.
Attorney for the Defendant (Respondent), Safeskin Corporation, in an Appeals case in which the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of four manufacturer/distributor defendants who produced and supplied latex gloves that the Plaintiff used in the course of her employment as a nurse, and that caused her to experience allergic reactions. The trial court ruled that the Plaintiff's claim was not filed in time. On Appeal, the summary judgement was overturned.
Additional Info
Sarrail Castillo & Hall Llp Highlights
Personal Injury, Construction, Employment