James Sarrail | Burlingame Personal Injury Lawyer

Main Office

111 Anza Blvd
Ste 203
Burlingame, CA 94010

Office Hours

Monday - Friday8:30 AM - 5:00 PM

Other Locations

Serving Burlingame, CA and the surrounding area.

Top Local Lawyers

About James

From our office in Burlingame, CA, Sarrail, Castillo & Hall, LLP represents both plaintiffs and defendants in Alameda County, Oakland, San Jose and San Francisco and across the Bay Area. Formed by Attorney James A. Sarrail, our Managing Partner, in 1971, our firm concentrates its practice mainly on personal injury and auto accidents, and also advises on employment law and construction defect problems.

Our friendly and straightforward approach to personal injury and claims gets the best results for our clients. We have learned from years of assisting injured clients that additional stress is unnecessary when our firm recovers maximum compensation.

Call regarding fee structure.

Experience

Sr. Partner

Sarrail, Castillo & Hall, LLP

Present

Burlingame, CA

Admission

Verified California

1969

Education

Northwestern University

BS (Political Science)

1965

Recognitions & Achievements

Associations
  • California State Bar

Notable Work

Cases

BORG V. TRANSAMERICA INS. CO

Defendant: Attorney for the defendant/respondent, TransAmerica Insurance Company. The plaintiff, George Borg, appealed an adverse judgment in his claim against TransAmerica. He had originally filed a claim for breach of duty to defend under the terms of comprehensive general liability policy. The appellant argued that the trial court erred in their determination that the defendant had no duty to defend the lawsuit because the encroachment was created prior to the effective date of the insurance policy. After review of the original case and decision as well as the insurance policy purchased by the appellant, the appeals court agreed with the appellant. They found that the court had erred in their decision and it was ordered that the judgement be reversed.

CLARK v BAXTER HEALTHCARE

Attorney for the Defendant (Respondent), Safeskin Corporation, in an Appeals case in which the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of four manufacturer/distributor defendants who produced and supplied latex gloves that the Plaintiff used in the course of her employment as a nurse, and that caused her to experience allergic reactions. The trial court ruled that the Plaintiff's claim was not filed in time. On Appeal, the summary judgement was overturned.

Sarrail Castillo & Hall Llp Highlights

Personal Injury, Construction, Employment

Firm Size: 1
Firm Locations: 1