John J. Hare, Attorney
John J. Hare
Other, Litigation, Civil & Human Rights, Accident & Injury, Personal Injury
http://www.marshalldennehey.com
- Law Office: Marshall Dennehey, P.C.
- Philadelphia Law Firms
- Law School: Duquesne University School of Law
- Status: In Good Standing * Status is reviewed annually, For latest information visit here
- Licensed: 31 years
215-575-2609
- Profile LAWPOINTS™42/ 100LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers - No Misconduct Found *Status is reviewed annually, For latest information visit here ✓
- Upgrade to a premium listing
- Update your listing
- LAWYERID™ Not AvailableLawyerID™'s identify each individual within Lawyer.com’s directory of 2M global lawyers and help to ensure that the most accurate, up-to-date records are being kept on every lawyer. If you are a practicing lawyer without a LawyerID prominently displayed on your Lawyer.com profile, please call 800-840-0600 to receive one.
Contact Us
Accident & Injury Criminal Civil & Human Rights DUI-DWI Personal Injury
1515 Market St Philadelphia 19102 USPersonal Injury Slip & Fall Accident Car Accident Medical Malpractice
1515 MARKET STREET PHILADELPHIA 19102 USEmployment Wrongful Termination Workers' Compensation Employment Discrimination Sexual Harassment
2 Penn Center, Suite 1240 Philadelphia 19102 USAccident & Injury Car Accident Animal Bite Slip & Fall Accident Sexual Harassment
2 Penn Center, Suite 1240 Philadelphia 19102 USAccident & Injury Personal Injury Civil & Human Rights Employment Social Security -- Disability
1500 John F. Kennedy Blvd Philadelphia 19102 USAnimal Bite Nursing Home Mass Torts Car Accident Personal Injury
1500 John F. Kennedy Blvd Philadelphia 19102 USAccident & Injury Slip & Fall Accident Personal Injury Medical Malpractice Employment
1500 JFK Blvd Philadelphia 19102 USAccident & Injury Criminal Divorce & Family Law DUI-DWI
1515 Market St. Philadelphia 19102 USCriminal Personal Injury Estate Real Estate Shareholders' Rights
100 S Broad St Philadelphia 19110 US
introduction
John is a highly-experienced appellate attorney who serves as Chair of the firm's seven-attorney Appellate Advocacy & Post-Trial Practice Group. He has litigated more than 300 appeals in state and federal appellate courts. John's diverse practice includes cases involving professional malpractice, civil rights claims, product liability, toxic torts, construction accidents, employment claims, and premises liability. In addition to litigating cases in the appellate courts, he is actively engaged in developing and implementing both trial and appellate strategy, prosecuting and defending pre-trial, trial, and post-trial motions, and acting as appellate counsel on trial teams in high-exposure cases. John also frequently speaks on appellate topics and has submitted amicus curiae briefs to appellate courts on behalf of various organizations.
Along with former Pennsylvania Superior Court Judge Patrick Tamilia, John was commissioned by the Superior Court in 1995 to draft a comprehensive history of the Court to commemorate its Centennial Anniversary. The book, entitled Keystone of Justice: The Pennsylvania Superior Court, 1895-1995, was published by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 2000 and is one of the nation's leading studies of a state appellate court.
In 2008 and 2009, John was recognized by Law & Politics/Philadelphia Magazine as a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer in the area of appellate practice, a distinction applied to five percent of Pennsylvania attorneys based upon a peer selection and evaluation process. John also appears in the 2009 and 2010 editions of Super Lawyers, Corporate Counsel Edition.
Significant Representative Cases
- In a decision reconciling two conflicting lines of cases, t
- The Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated a $5 million verdict against John's client and remanded for a new trial on the basis that the jury should have been allowed to consider whether the plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations. Urbach v. Kentile, Inc., et al., 915 A.2d 159 (Pa. Super. 2006), appeal denied,
- In the first comprehensive appellate decision interpreting Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1042.3-1042.6, Pennsylvania's tort reform measure intended to increase the threshold of merit for professional liability actions, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded for the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of John's client, a physician, based upon the plaintiff's failure to file a certificate of merit in support of his medical malpractice claim. O'Hara v. Randall, 879 A.2d 240 (Pa. Super. 2005)
- In the first appellate decision interpreting and applying Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1006(a.1), Pennsylvania's tort reform measure involving venue, the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the ruling of the trial court and held that the plaintiff's medical malpractice action against John's client, a physician, must be transferred out of Philadelphia County. Connor v. Crozer Keystone Health Sys., 832 A.2d 1112 (Pa. Super. 2003)
- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed two lower courts and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, erasing a substantial judgment against John's client, a professional corporation, on the basis that the plaintiff's res ipsa loquitur theory of liability was invalid as a matter of law. Toogood v. Rogal, 824 A.2d 1140 (Pa. 2003)
- The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, erasing a substantial judgment against John's client, a hospital, on the basis that, although the plaintiff had adduced some evidence to support her claims, the evidence was not sufficient to establish a prima facie case of negligence. Van Zandt v. Holy Redeemer Hospital, 806 A.2d 809 (Pa. 2002)
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the judgment of the federal district court and ruled that an ordinance passed by John's client, a Pennsylvania municipality, did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. Philadelphia Owners Association v. City of Philadelphia et al, 57 Fed. Appx. 961 (3d Cir. 2003)
- The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded for the re-entry of judgment in favor of John's client, a nonprofit corporation that had entered into an agreement to buy real estate, on the basis that the trial court had erroneously stricken the judgment. Crystal Lake Camps v. Alford, 2007 PA Super 119 (Pa. Super. 2007)
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the federal district court and dismissed the plaintiff's civil rights claims on the basis that John's clients, county officials, were entitled to absolute immunity from liability for actions taken in their official capacities. Laverdure v. County of Montgomery, 324 F.3d 123 (3d Cir. 2003)
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the federal district court and upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff's product liability claims against John's client, a manufacturer of scaffolding equipment, after a jury found that the manufacturer was not responsible for the construction accident that injured the plaintiff. Johnson v. Vanguard Manufacturing, 34 Fed. Appx. 858 (3d Cir. 2002)
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the federal district court and upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against John's clients, attorneys and their law firm, on the basis that the plaintiff had failed to prove the necessary element of causation. My Le Duong v. Nationwide Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27617 (3d Cir. 2006)
- The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the federal district court and upheld the dismissal of all claims against John's client, a law firm, on the basis that the plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations and the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Seawright v. Greenberg, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9248 (3d Cir. 2007)
- The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the ruling of the trial court and held that the plaintiff was not entitled to retry her claims against John's client, a hospital. Stalsitz v. Allentown Hospital, 814 A.2d 766 (Pa. Super. 2004)
- The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the ruling of the trial court, which entered judgment for John's client, that the City of Philadelphia and the Philadelphia Phillies owed no duty to a spectator at a baseball game who was partially blinded when hit by a foul ball. Pakett v. The City of Philadelphia et al, 871 A.2d 304 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005)
QUESTIONNAIRE
Experience
| Position | Organization | Location | Duration |
|---|
Education
| School | Degree | Major | Graduation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duquesne University School of Law | Law School | N/A | |
| University of California |
Admission
| State / Court | Date |
|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | 1994 |
| District 1 |
Associations
Honors & Awards
Cases
Van Zandt v. Holy Redeemer Hospital 2002
Toogood v. Rogal 2003
Stalsitz v. Allentown Hospital 2004
Seawright v. Greenberg 2007
Philadelphia Owners Association v. City of Philadelphia et al 2003
Pakett v. The City of Philadelphia et al 2005
O'Hara v. Randall 2005
My Le Duong v. Nationwide Ins. Co. 2006
Laverdure v. County of Montgomery 2003
Johnson v. Vanguard Manufacturing 2002
Crystal Lake Camps v. Alford 2007
Connor v. Crozer Keystone Health Sys. 2003
Publications
Office Hours
| Sun. | Mon. | Tue. | Wed. | Thu. | Fri. | Sat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verified Credentials
Lawyers with longer memberships tend to have more experience so we use the Membership date to help prioritize lawyer listings on search pages.
| Verified Credentials | Date Verified |
|---|
Above credentials have been verified independently by Lawyer.com.
Learn More
Legal Articles
Peer Endorsements
Additional Info
PA
Service Type: Private
Update Date: 2023-10-19
To recommend or link to this lawyer as a trusted attorney, we have provided a list of sample links. Please choose the one that meet your needs.
Want a Premium Customized Photo Badge?
Call Toll Free: 800-620-0900
Image Link 1
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/john-hare.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1669179i.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 2
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/john-hare.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1669179p.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 3
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/john-hare.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1669179f.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Image Link 4
<div id="Lcom"><a href="//www.lawyer.com/john-hare.html"><img alt="Lawyer.com" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal/1669179v.png"></a></div><script type="text/javascript" src="//www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Text Link 1
<div id="Lcom" style="width:250px;text-align:center;background-color: #fbaa02;padding:3px;"><a href="http://www.lawyer.com/john-hare.html" style="color: #fff;text-decoration:none;size: 12px;">Lawyer.com Listed: John J. Hare</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.lawyer.com/seal.js"></script>
Change History
2000 Market St
Suite 2300
Philadelphia, PA 19103