John Ervin | Darlington Criminal Lawyer
Top Local Lawyers
Premium
Douglas Jennings
Douglas Jennings Law Firm, LLC
Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Trucking
151 Broad St. P.O. Drawer 995
Bennettsville, SC 29512
Premium
Derek L. Harper
Schiller & Hamilton Law Firm
Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury, Estate, Power of Attorney, Workers' Compensation
302 N. Main Street Suite C
Lancaster, SC 29720
Premium
Charnell Glenn Peake
Peake & Fowler Law Firm, P.A.
Accident & Injury, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury
9357 Two Notch Road
Columbia, SC 29223
Premium
J. Erik Groves
J. Erik Groves, P.C.
Accident & Injury, Estate, Business, Personal Injury, Wills & Probate
604 Old Providence Road
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Premium
Trevor Penrose Eddy
The Eddy Law Firm
Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice, Household Mold
1516 Richland Street Suite B
Columbia, SC 29201
Premium
Jason Reynolds
Samuels Reynolds, LLC
Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Animal Bite
1320 Richland Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Premium
Philip Wesley Jackson
Rogers Lewis Jackson Mann & Quinn, Llc
Health Care, Litigation, Employment, Personal Injury, Whistleblower
1901 Main Street Suite 1200
Columbia, SC 29201
Premium
Jacob Taylor Bell
Jeffcoat Criminal Defense Lawyers
Criminal, White Collar Crime, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Felony
1333 Main Street Suite 512
Columbia, SC 29201
Premium
G. Robin Alley
Isaacs & Alley LLP
Family Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Divorce, General Practice
2000 Park Street Suite 100
Columbia, SC 29201
About John
John Ervin began his legal career as a law clerk to Circuit Judge Sydney Floyd in 1985. He returned to Columbia, SC and began prosecuting drug cases and violent crimes for the Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s office in 1986.
In 1989 he returned to the Pee Dee region to work in Darlington, SC as a solicitor prosecuting serious felony cases and continued in that position until 1991, when he entered private practice full time.
Mr Ervin was certified as lead counsel in death penalty cases by the SC Supreme Court in 1991 and has tried numerous criminal, civil and domestic cases since.
He joined the Federal Criminal Justice Act (CJA) panel in 1992 and has represented over three hundred retained and appointed federal clients.
In 1989 he returned to the Pee Dee region to work in Darlington, SC as a solicitor prosecuting serious felony cases and continued in that position until 1991, when he entered private practice full time.
Mr Ervin was certified as lead counsel in death penalty cases by the SC Supreme Court in 1991 and has tried numerous criminal, civil and domestic cases since.
He joined the Federal Criminal Justice Act (CJA) panel in 1992 and has represented over three hundred retained and appointed federal clients.
Call today for your initial free consultation.
Experience
Lawyer
Ervin Law Office
Present
Darlington, SC
Admission
South Carolina
1985
Education
University of South Carolina
BA
1981
Recognitions & Achievements
Associations
-
South Carolina State Bar
-
Darlington County and American Bar Associations
-
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
-
South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association
-
South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyers Association
Notable Work
Cases
On brief in a South Carolina Appeals case in which Dr. Erik Dehlinger (Appellant ) appealed a lower Court ruling. In the original trial, Appellant was found guilty of three counts of tax evasion and sentenced to 42 months imprisonment. Appellant was found guilty of using a program by a company (AAA) to avoid paying personal income tax. In the initial trial, it was found that Dehlinger committed perjury for the sole purpose of deceiving the jury regarding his culpability and involvement with AAA. The Appeals Court affirmed the original ruling.
Appellants: Attorney for the appellants, Tara and Andree Rabuck. Tara is the biological mother of the child in question and Andrew the stepfather. The couple sought to terminate the parental rights of Robert Wilomovsky, the child's biological father. The Family courts denied the request and the Rabuck's subsequently appealed this decision. They argue that the court erred as Wilomovsky has made no efforts to visit the child, he has a condition which prevents him from providing minimally acceptable care. The appeals court found that the family court did not err in their decision and the judgment was affirmed. The mater of visitation was remanded back to the family court as the child has not seen the father in over four years and would require a mediator and supervised visitation until such time the courts find that the child is comfortable.
Additional Info
Ervin Law Office Highlights
Criminal, Litigation
Firm Size:
1
Firm Locations:
1