Megargel DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Megargel DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Megargel Criminal lawyers.

David Adrian Levy

Government, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

103 N Sycamore, Archer City, TX 76351

Susan Wisener Elliott

Family Law, Criminal, Wills, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

101 S Washington St, Seymour, TX 76380

Louis Dayne Miller

Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 64 Years

CONTACT

Graham, TX 76450

Dee Hudson Peavy

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

516 Fourth Street, Graham, TX 76450

Scott Hudson

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 68 Years

CONTACT

Graham, TX 76450

Christopher Dennis Baran

International Other, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

Graham, TX 76450

Phillip Craig Gregory

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

Graham, TX 76450

Lawrence B. Teis

Family Law, Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 58 Years

CONTACT

Graham, TX 76450

Spencer Rowley

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

Wichita Falls, TX 76308

Gary Allen Taylor

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

495 Minnetonga Trl, Wichita Falls, TX 76310

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

... We reverse. 874 The Controversy [1]. On June 24, 2003, an assistant district attorney in Montgomery County presented an information in the trial court charging appellant with misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI). The ...

Peavey v. State

... At the penalty stage of the trial, appellant pleaded "true" to the three prior felony convictions alleged for the enhancement of punishment, including: a felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction in 2003 in the same district court; convictions for possession of a controlled ...

Brown v. State

... Brown was placed in custody and charged with DWI-Misdemeanor Repetition. ... 2000). B. Applicable Law. Under Texas law, a person commits DWI "if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place." Tex. Penal Code Ann. Â§ 49.04 (Vernon 2008). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Megargel DUI-DWI Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David Adrian Levy

Susan Wisener Elliott

Louis Dayne Miller

Dee Hudson Peavy

Scott Hudson

Christopher Dennis Baran

Phillip Craig Gregory

Lawrence B. Teis

Spencer Rowley

Gary Allen Taylor

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

JURY NULLIFICATION

MOTION IN LIMINE

BURDEN OF PROOF

HABEAS CORPUS

BURGLARY

CRIMINAL INSANITY

PLEA

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Amador v. State

Peavey v. State

Brown v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details