Miriam E. Zakarin | New York Child Support, Custody, Family Law Attorney

Top Local Lawyers
Kerry Bretz
Bretz & Coven, LLP
Immigration, Deportation, Visa,
305 Broadway Suite 100
New York, NY 10007
Jeffrey E. Litman
Litman & Litman, P.C.
Accident & Injury, Immigration, Criminal, Estate,
305 Broadway 1st Floor
Manhattan, NY 10007
Courtney Davy
Law Office of Courtney K. Davy
Criminal, Estate, Accident & Injury, Real Estate, Divorce & Family Law
305 Broadway, Suite 1400
New York, NY 10007
Russel Morgan
Morgan Legal Group, P.C.
Estate Planning, Contract, Elder Law, Commercial Real Estate, Trusts
299 Broadway 17th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Arthur Zachary Schwartz
Advocates for Justice, CA
Employee Rights,
225 Broadway Suite 1902
New York, NY 10007
Noah Aaron Kinigstein
Noah A. Kinigstein
Employment, Pension & Benefits, Discrimination, Civil & Human Rights, Civil Rights
225 Broadway Suite 1901
New York, NY 10007
Michael Edward Giordano
Fasulo Braverman & Di Maggio, LLP
Criminal, Business, Lawsuit & Dispute,
225 Broadway Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
Nicholas Ivan Timko
Kahn, Gordon, Timko & Rodriques, P.C.
Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Car Accident, Wrongful Death,
20 Vesey St Suite 300
New York, NY 10007
David Blum
David Blum & Associates
Immigration, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy & Debt
30 Vesey Street 4th Floor
New York, NY 10007
About Miriam
Miriam Zakarin is a partner at Treuhaft & Zakarin, LLP. Ms. Zakarin earned her Juris Doctor from Brooklyn Law School in 2004. Her practice experience primarily focuses on matrimonial and family law. Ms. Zakarin also handles immigration and class action matters. Ms. Zakarin is admitted in both New York and New Jersey federal and state courts.
Free 15 minute phone consultations!
Experience
Founding Partner
Treuhaft & Zakarin, LLP
2005 - Present
New York, NY
Admission
New Jersey
2005
New York
2005
Education
John Jay College, City University of New York
B.A. (Legal Studies)
2001

Recognitions & Achievements
-
New York
-
New Jersey
-
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
-
United States District Court Eastern District of New York
-
United States District Court Southern District of New York
-
United States Court of Federal Claims
-
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
-
American Institute’s 10 Best | American Institute of Family Law Attorneys
Notable Work
Introduction and Background On March 9, 2016, the defendant moved by emergency order to show cause [motion sequence #1] for the following relief: a) awarding the defendant sole legal and physical custody of the infant child of the marriage, who was born in October of 2015; b) directing the plaintiff be made to pay defendant basic child support for the subject child in accordance with the Child Support Standards Act, pendente lite; c) directing the plaintiff to maintain health insurance for the defendant and the subject child; d) directing the plaintiff to pay for child care and related costs, and unreimbursed medical expenses for the subject child; e) directing that the Kings County Family Court action be consolidated with this action to the Kings County Supreme Court; f) directing that the plaintiff pay to the defendant spousal maintenance that are currently in arrears in the amount of $12,500, and calculate future payments of pendente lite spousal support as per the NYS Court calculator; g) directing the plaintiff to pay to Treuhaft and Zakarin, LLP the sum of $10,000 as and for defendant's pendente lite counsel fees, without prejudice to seek additional fees as needed; and h) for such other and further relief for the defendant as this Court may deem just and proper. The defendant appeared on March 9, 2016 as a result of filing an ex parte application and pursuant to 22NYCRR 202.7(a), before the Hon. Eric I. Prus, sitting as the Emergency Judge in this County that day, who issued an order directing the plaintiff to provide the defendant and subject child with health insurance, and a lump sum payment of $7,500 towards spousal support arrears pursuant to the Kings County Family Court order of spousal support and to appear before the undersigned, the assigned judge, on March 22, 2016.[FN1] On March 22, 2016, the plaintiff filed a cross-motion [motion sequence #2] requesting the following relief: a) ordering the defendant and subject child to submit to a DNA test; b) modifying the order of spousal support issued by the Family Court in light of the fact that the defendant is a physician assistant and the Court should impute to the defendant $100,000 per year in income; and c) granting such other and further relief that this Court deems just and proper. Read More......
Lawyernomics Speaker | Superuser Lawyer Insights