Muncie Antitrust Lawyer, Indiana


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

John Douglas Razumich

Antitrust, Constitutional Law, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Muncie Antitrust Lawyers and Muncie Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.

... 1. Whether Berghausen, as an indirect purchaser, had standing to bring his antitrust claim against Microsoft; 2. Whether Berghausen's allegation of degradation of his computer's performance states a claim of an "antitrust injury"; and. ...

Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.

... II. Indiana Antitrust Act. ... D. Specific Provisions of the Indiana Antitrust Act. Natare claims a violation of Section 3, and seeks treble damages for its lost time in preparing a useless bid and attorney fees, under Section 7 of the Indiana Antitrust Act. ...

City of Auburn v. Mavis

... (D & L). Mavis alleged that prior to open and competitive bidding the city and D & L contrived to develop specifications favoring equipment sold by D & L such that they violated the antitrust statute. Mavis claimed as damages the time spent in preparing his bid. ...