By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.

... 1. Whether Berghausen, as an indirect purchaser, had standing to bring his antitrust claim against Microsoft; 2. Whether Berghausen's allegation of degradation of his computer's performance states a claim of an "antitrust injury"; and. ...

Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.

... II. Indiana Antitrust Act. ... D. Specific Provisions of the Indiana Antitrust Act. Natare claims a violation of Section 3, and seeks treble damages for its lost time in preparing a useless bid and attorney fees, under Section 7 of the Indiana Antitrust Act. ...

City of Auburn v. Mavis

... (D & L). Mavis alleged that prior to open and competitive bidding the city and D & L contrived to develop specifications favoring equipment sold by D & L such that they violated the antitrust statute. Mavis claimed as damages the time spent in preparing his bid. ...

Fort Wayne Antitrust Lawyer, Indiana

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Joshua Daniel Byanski

Duane J. Snow

Jeffrey S. Gotsch

Martin E. Seifert

J. Spencer Feighner

Vincent J. Heiny

Stephen E. Lewis

Mark C. Chambers

Jeffrey P. Smith

Charles J. Heiny

TIPS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.

Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.

City of Auburn v. Mavis

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details