Nespelem Child Support Lawyer, Washington


Roberto M. Saenz

Family Law, Military, Federal, Criminal
Status:  Suspended           Licensed:  43 Years

Victoria Lenore Minto

Landlord-Tenant, Employment Discrimination, Family Law, Civil Rights
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  30 Years

Robert Virgil Flock

Federal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  56 Years

Owen M. Gardner

Land Use & Zoning, Family Law, Municipal, Disability
Status:  Inactive           Licensed:  54 Years

Michael Lee Larsen

Personal Injury, Family Law, Landlord-Tenant, Traffic
Status:  Deceased           Licensed:  50 Years

Ryan William Gunn

Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Criminal, Litigation, Landlord-Tenant
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  17 Years

Leone Reinbold

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Indians & Native Populations
Status:  In Good Standing           

Melissa Ann Macdougall

Insurance, Personal Injury, Civil Rights, Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  24 Years

Rachelle Lorrae Lawson

General Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  11 Years

Michael W. Lynch

Juvenile Law, Landlord-Tenant, Traffic, Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  38 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Nespelem Child Support Lawyers and Nespelem Child Support Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Divorce & Family Law areas including Adoption, Child Custody, Divorce and Family Law attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES

Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable... (more...)
Differences between spouses that are considered sufficiently severe to make married life together more or less impossible. In a number of states, irreconcilable differences is the accepted ground for a no-fault divorce. As a practical matter, courts seldom, if ever, inquire into what the differences actually are, and routinely grant a divorce as long as the party seeking the divorce says the couple has irreconcilable differences. Compare incompatibility; irremediable breakdown.

RESTRAINING ORDER

An order from a court directing one person not to do something, such as make contact with another person, enter the family home or remove a child from the state... (more...)
An order from a court directing one person not to do something, such as make contact with another person, enter the family home or remove a child from the state. Restraining orders are typically issued in cases in which spousal abuse or stalking is feared -- or has occurred -- in an attempt to ensure the victim's safety. Restraining orders are also commonly issued to cool down ugly disputes between neighbors.

SPLIT CUSTODY

A custody arrangement in the case of multiple children, awarding sole custody of one child to one parent and sole custody of another child to the other parent. ... (more...)
A custody arrangement in the case of multiple children, awarding sole custody of one child to one parent and sole custody of another child to the other parent. This arrangement is generally disfavored by judges because they are reluctant to split up siblings.

COLLUSION

Secret cooperation between two people in order to fool another. Collusion was often practiced by couples before no-fault divorce in order to make up a grounds f... (more...)
Secret cooperation between two people in order to fool another. Collusion was often practiced by couples before no-fault divorce in order to make up a grounds for divorce (such as adultery). By fabricating a permitted reason for divorce, colluding couples hoped to trick a judge into granting their freedom from the marriage. But a spouse accused of wrongdoing who later changed his or her mind about the divorce could expose the collusion to prevent the divorce from going through.

MISUNDERSTANDING

A mistake by both spouses in a marriage that can serve as grounds for an annulment. For example, if one spouse went into the marriage wanting children while the... (more...)
A mistake by both spouses in a marriage that can serve as grounds for an annulment. For example, if one spouse went into the marriage wanting children while the other did not, they have a misunderstanding that will be judged serious enough for a court to terminate the marriage.

INTERLOCUTORY DECREE

A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. ... (more...)
A court judgment that is not final until the judge decides other matters in the case or until enough time has passed to see if the interim decision is working. In the past, interlocutory decrees were most often used in divorces. The terms of the divorce were set out in an interlocutory decree, which would become final only after a waiting period. The purpose of the waiting period was to allow the couple time to reconcile. They rarely did, however, so most states no longer use interlocutory decrees of divorce.

NEXT OF KIN

The closest relatives, as defined by state law, of a deceased person. Most states recognize the spouse and the nearest blood relatives as next of kin.

ALIMONY

The money paid by one ex-spouse to the other for support under the terms of a court order or settlement agreement following a divorce. Except in marriages of lo... (more...)
The money paid by one ex-spouse to the other for support under the terms of a court order or settlement agreement following a divorce. Except in marriages of long duration (ten years or more) or in the case of an ailing spouse, alimony usually lasts for a set period, with the expectation that the recipient spouse will become self-supporting. Alimony is also called 'spousal support' or 'maintenance.'

IN CAMERA

Latin for 'in chambers.' A legal proceeding is 'in camera' when a hearing is held before the judge in her private chambers or when the public is excluded from t... (more...)
Latin for 'in chambers.' A legal proceeding is 'in camera' when a hearing is held before the judge in her private chambers or when the public is excluded from the courtroom. Proceedings are often held in camera to protect victims and witnesses from public exposure, especially if the victim or witness is a child. There is still, however, a record made of the proceeding, typically by a court stenographer. The judge may decide to seal this record if the material is extremely sensitive or likely to prejudice one side or the other.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re Parentage of Fairbanks

... KULIK, J. ¶ 1 In November 2004, Ritchie Norman filed a petition to modify the child support for his daughter Jayla. After filing the ... Security benefit award. The court determined that Mr. Norman had made an overpayment of child support. ...

In re Custody of CCM

... 12 The court also entered a judgment for back child support in the amounts of $14,000 against Pomiak and $23,000 against Spencer. ... The Mecums further contend that the trial court erred in entering the judgment for back child support against Pomiak. ...

In re Marriage of Krieger and Walker

... AGID, J. ¶ 1 Marilyn Walker appeals the trial court's order setting child support at the advisory amount for combined monthly incomes over $7,000. ... We therefore hold that the trial court abused its discretion in setting child support at the advisory amount. Accordingly, we reverse. ...