North Freedom DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

David Saperstein
About | Practice Areas
Hurley Burish, S.C.
33 East Main Street Suite 400 Madison, WI 53703» view map
Estate and Criminal Defense Law
A Law Firm You Can Trust

Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work.

608-257-0945
1. David Saperstein Madison, WI
  Attorney at Law- WI
  DePaul University College of Law, J.D. 1995
2. AboutHurley Burish, S.C.
  A Law Firm You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

David E. Saperstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI

David E. Saperstein is first, and foremost, a trial lawyer. He is in his element, at his best, when he is advocating for his clients in the courtroom.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608-257-0945

33 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Steven W. Zaleski

Farms, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10 East Doty Street, Madison, WI 53703

Tracey Ann Wood

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

6605 University Avenue, Middleton, WI 53562

J. Steven House

Traffic, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

30 W. Mifflin St., Madison, WI 53703

Marinus (Rick) J.W. Petri

Dispute Resolution, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

33 E Main St, Madison, WI 53701

Christopher Van Wagner

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Robert D. Zitowsky

Patent, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

131 W. Wilson St., Madison, WI 53703

Christopher T Van Wagner

Environmental Law, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10 E. Doty St., Madison, WI 53703

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

... Id. at 100. In rejecting the plaintiff's challenge, the court clarified that a summary suspension under the "zero tolerance" law is not a summary suspension under DUI law, and therefore "[p]laintiff's reliance on DUI law is puzzling because plaintiff was not arrested for DUI." Id. ...

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

... The State counters that because Malsbury's Washington conviction was originally charged as driving under the influence (DUI) and later amended to reckless driving with OWI-like penalties, the conviction counts for purposes of Wisconsin's OWI laws. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

North Freedom DUI-DWI Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Hurley Burish, S.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David E. Saperstein

Steven W. Zaleski

Tracey Ann Wood

J. Steven House

Marinus (Rick) J.W. Petri

Christopher Van Wagner

Robert D. Zitowsky

Christopher T Van Wagner

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

LARCENY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

ACCOMPLICE

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CHARGE

CAPITAL CASE

CIVIL

PROSECUTE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Carter

State v. Carter

State v. MALSBURY

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details