North Henderson DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Scott Kamin
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin
53 W. Jackson Blvd Suite 1057 Chicago, IL 60604» view map
Criminal Defense & Felony
If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT

My goal as your criminal defense lawyer is to help you minimize the consequences you face. I have extensive outside resources and an experienced staff on my side.

800-963-2980
1. Scott Kamin Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1995
  Drake University J.D. 1994
2. AboutLaw Offices of Scott T. Kamin
  If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense & Felony
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Anthony Vaupel

Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Galesburg, IL 61401

Andrew L. Youngquist

Estate, Trusts, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

106 Market Alley Street, Monmouth, IL 61462

Steven Ames

Traffic, Workers' Compensation, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Orion, IL 61273

Stephanie Ames

Traffic, Workers' Compensation, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

1000 3Rd St, Orion, IL 61273

Stephanie Alexandrea Ames

Litigation, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

1000 3Rd St, Orion, IL 61273

Steven Charles Ames

Traffic, Workers' Compensation, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

1000 Third Street, Orion, IL 61273

Aaron Matthew Dyer

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

622 19Th Street, Moline, IL 61265

Thomas Matthew Benson

Divorce, Child Custody, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4506 7Th Avenue, Rock Island, IL 61201

Thomas Benson

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4506 7Th Avenue, Rock Island, IL 61201

Derek Hancks

Divorce, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

329 18Th St, Rock Island, IL 61201

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

... objection, dismissed the three citations and recharged defendant, in an information, with driving with a blood-alcohol content over 0.08, noting in the charge the existence of the sentence-enhancing factor (driving on a revoked license), which elevated the DUI offense to ...

People v. Gonzalez

... begin there. Prior to January 1, 2006, section 11-501 provided that driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) constituted aggravated DUI in six instances, none of which are relevant to further discussion. However, section ...

People v. Prouty

... After a bench trial, defendant, Edmund T. Prouty, was convicted of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 â€” 501(d)(1)(A) (West 2006)). ... The indictment stated that aggravated DUI was a Class 2 felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

North Henderson DUI-DWI Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Anthony Vaupel

Andrew L. Youngquist

Steven Ames

Stephanie Ames

Stephanie Alexandrea Ames

Steven Charles Ames

Aaron Matthew Dyer

Thomas Matthew Benson

Thomas Benson

Derek Hancks

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

EAVESDROPPING

PLEA

CAPITAL CASE

BURDEN OF PROOF

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

PROBABLE CAUSE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

CONVICTION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Van Schoyck

People v. Gonzalez

People v. Prouty

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details