Refugio Traffic Lawyer, Texas

Guy Williams

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Family Law, Traffic
Status:  In Good Standing           

Jay Kaskie

Status:  In Good Standing           

Jerry Clark

Traffic, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  26 Years

Phillip Wayne Goff

Criminal, Traffic
Status:  In Good Standing           
Speak with

Robert E Brunkenhoefer

Personal Injury, Traffic, Transportation & Shipping, Credit & Debt
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  49 Years

Reynaldo Martinez Jr.

Traffic, Family Law, Medical Malpractice, Trusts
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  24 Years

Charles C Smith

Traffic, Civil Rights, Family Law, Labor Disputes
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  33 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided may not be privileged or confidential.


Easily find Refugio Traffic Lawyers and Refugio Traffic Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Motor Vehicle areas including Defect and Lemon Law attorneys.


Fowler v. State

... The question in this DWI case is whether a police officer has probable cause or reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop when the officer observes the tires of the defendant's vehicle cross into an adjacent same-direction lane by a tire's width a single time when there is no other ...

Kuciemba v. State

... [7] "Circumstantial evidence is as probative as direct evidence in establishing the guilt of an actor" and "the standard of review on appeal is the same for both direct and circumstantial evidence cases." [8] Being intoxicated at the scene of a traffic accident in which the actor was a ...

Caraway v. State

... Background. On August 31, 2005, at about 11:00 am, Department of Public Safety Trooper Jason Shea made a traffic stop of appellant because he believed that appellant's vehicle had illegal tint on its windows. Appellant does not challenge the legality of the reason for the stop. ...

Now Chatting...