San Jacinto Criminal Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

J. Jeffrey Morris
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of J. Jeffrey Morris
11845 West Olympic Boulevard Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90064» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Difficult Cases and Clients Are Welcome

J. Jeffrey Morris is an experienced attorney who has been practicing law in California since 1987.

800-781-3531
1. J. Jeffrey Morris Los Angeles, CA
  Attorney at Law- CA, 1986
  Loyola Law School, J.D. 1986
2. AboutLaw Office of J. Jeffrey Morris
  Difficult Cases and Clients Are Welcome
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert Allan Davis

Litigation, Estate, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

1001 E Morton Pl, Hemet, CA 92543

Lindsey Michele Burcham

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal, Constitutional Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

Beaumont, CA 92223

Julie M Clark

Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

236 N. State Street, Hemet, CA 92543

James Melvin Taylor

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

66 West Ramsey Street, Banning, CA 92220

Kenny Ray Padilla

Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

Beaumont, CA 92223

Raymon Eugene Hallard

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

3800 W Wilson St, Banning, CA 92220

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

... Code, Â§Â§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 264.1), forcible sexual penetration while acting in concert (id., Â§Â§ 289, subd. (a)(1), 264.1), and active participation in a criminal street gang (id., Â§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury further found that the sex ...

In re Lawrence

... 1189 Carrie L. Hempel, Michael J. Brennan and Heidi L. Rummel for Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. Munger, Tolles & Olson, Blanca F. Young and Hailyn J. Chen for Stanford Criminal Justice Center as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. ...

People v. Vazquez

... (b)-(d)), and that he committed the murder for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (Â§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). Appellant was sentenced to a total term in state prison of 50 years to life. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

San Jacinto Criminal Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of J. Jeffrey Morris

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Allan Davis

Lindsey Michele Burcham

Julie M Clark

James Melvin Taylor

Kenny Ray Padilla

Raymon Eugene Hallard

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CAPITAL CASE

WARRANT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

CORPUS DELECTI

CIVIL

BAIL

DIRECTED VERDICT

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

In re Lawrence

People v. Vazquez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details