2. / /

Shannon County, MO Discrimination Lawyers


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Member Representative

800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Member Representative

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Missouri Discrimination Lawyers and Missouri Discrimination Law Firms for your location. Narrow your Discrimination attorney search for Missouri by major city or a specific Missouri city using the city list. Or search for Missouri Discrimination attorneys by county. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hill v. Ford Motor Co.

... nonmovant. Id. III. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS UNDER THE MHRA. A. The Missouri Human Rights Act, Not Federal Case Law, Provides the Framework for Analyzing Discrimination and Retaliation Claims. The ...

Stanley v. JerDen Foods, Inc.

... appeals the judgment of the trial court in the amount of $10,390.42 in favor of Dean Stanley. Mr. Stanley sued the company under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA) for age discrimination. ... Mr. Stanley subsequently sued JerDen Foods for age discrimination. ...

Kesler-Ferguson v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

... its strike; (2) it misapplied the standard for finding that Hy-Vee's strike was racially motivated; (3) it improperly placed the burden of persuasion on Hy-Vee by requiring Hy-Vee to justify its strike with a race-neutral explanation; and (4) Kesler did not prove invidious discrimination. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

  • Free Consultation
  • Male
  • Female
  • Suspended

PRACTICE AREAS