Ask A Lawyer

Tell Us Your Case Information for Fastest Lawyer Match!

Please include all relevant details from your case including where, when, and who it involves.
Case details that can effectively describe the legal situation while also staying concise generally receive the best responses from lawyers.


By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy

Stephen Rutland Leffler

Stephen Leffler Lawyer

Stephen Rutland Leffler

Bad Faith Insurance, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Premises Liability, Discrimination; Wrongful Death; Traffic; Employment; Railroad Injury; Sexual Harassment; White Collar Crime; Products Liability; Eminent Domain; Animal Bite; DUI-DWI; Car Accident; Aviation Accident; Criminal; Personal Injury

(Please indicate if you do not want referral sent to multiple lawyers.)

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy
School Degree Major Graduation
Memphis State University School of Law Law School N/A
Centre College of Kentucky N/A N/A N/A
State / Court Date
U.S. Supreme Court 2001 N/A
U.S. District Court Western District of Tennessee 1986 N/A
U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit 1990 N/A
Tennessee 1984 N/A
  • United States vs. Marcus Boyd
  • United States vs. Bennie Holmes
  • Thomas David Jordan vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad
  • State vs. Michael Donato
  • State of Tennessee vs. Andrew Hennings
  • Perkins vs. Allstate Insurance Co.
  • Mark Northcutt vs Servicemaster
  • Hutchins vs. Burlington Northern
  • Holt vs. City of Memphis
  • Gregory vs. Shelby County, Tennessee
  • Conseco vs. Costello
Sun. Mon. Tue. Wed. Thu. Fri. Sat.
7:00 am
-
5:00 pm
7:00 am
-
5:00 pm
7:00 am
-
5:00 pm
7:00 am
-
5:00 pm
7:00 am
-
5:00 pm

Service Type:Private

Language:English


MAIN LOCATION

707 Adams Ave.
Memphis, TN 38105

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Injured Worker Did Not Have Requisite Causal Opinion From Doctor
In a recent 8th District decision, the Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of an employer who argued that records from claimant's treating physicians did not establish sufficient causal connection between diagnosis and workplace injury.
reedom to Operate Opinions: The Value of a Bold Patent Landscape Study
http://www.boldip.com/bold-blog/bold-update-freedom-to-operate-opinions-the-value-of-a-bold-patent-landscape-study
Federal Trademark Protection and the Likelihood of Confusion Test
http://www.boldip.com/bold-blog/-federal-trademark-protection-and-the-likelihood-of-confusion-test