Tim Clancy
Attorney, Clancy & Thompson, PLLC
Accident & Injury, Insurance, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Vaccine Injury
Personal, Private and Professional Service to Protect Your Rights
Personal, Private and Professional Service to Protect Your Rights
Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy & Debt, Medical Malpractice, Slip & Fall Accident, Car Accident
6506 S Lewis Ave Suite 160
Tulsa, OK 74137
Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Child Support, Prenuptial Agreements, Paternity
6660 S Sheridan Road Suite 240
Tulsa, OK 74133
Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI
2121 S. Columbia Ave., Ste. 580
Tulsa, OK 74114
Trademark, Patent, Copyright,
100 W. Fifth Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
Estate,
100 West 5th Street Suite 900
Tulsa, OK 74103
Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Child Support, Family Law, Custody & Visitation
427 South Boston Suite 402
Tulsa, OK 74103
Estate Planning, Family Law,
8211 E Regal Place Suite 100
Tulsa, OK 74133
Criminal, DUI-DWI,
314 South 5th St
Jay, OK 74346
Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death, Slip & Fall Accident, Malpractice, Social Security
15401 N. May Avenue Suite 800
Edmond, OK 73013
Offering free consultation. Call today to learn more about my fee structure.
Senior Partner
Clancy & Thompson, PLLC
Present
Tulsa, OK
Oklahoma
1990
University of Tulsa College of Law
J.D.
1990
Appellant: Attorney for the appellant, Brad Taylor of D/B/A? Taylor System of Houston. Taylor appeals the summary judgement granted by the district courts in favor the defendant-appellee, Travelers Insurance Company. Taylor was hired to repair car exteriors damaged while parked outside of the Case plant. The cars needed to have ferrous oxide removed. Taylor completed the job but some of the cars were damaged in the process. Case sued Taylor for damages. Taylor requested that Travelers defend him in the lawsuit as part of the liability insurance policy he had with them for his garage. Travelers refused to defend him and Taylor sued. Upon review of his policy the district court found that the Traveler's was not responsible for representing him or for recovering the income loss he suffered from having to pay case for damages. The appeals court review all the information and found that the district courts had not erred in their decision. The judgement was affirmed.
Accident & Injury, Insurance, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Vaccine Injury