Personal, Private and Professional Service to Protect Your Rights
Premium
Car Accident, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death,
7136 South Yale Avenue Suite 300
Tulsa, OK 74133
Premium
Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Child Support, Prenuptial Agreements, Paternity
6660 S Sheridan Road Suite 240
Tulsa, OK 74133
Premium
Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI
2121 S. Columbia Ave., Ste. 580
Tulsa, OK 74114
Premium
Accident & Injury, Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Business, Construction
1800 S Baltimore Ave Suite 550
Tulsa, OK 74119
Premium
Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death, Nursing Home, Personal Injury, Malpractice
15 West 6th St Suite 2800
Tulsa, OK 74119
Premium
Trademark, Patent, Copyright,
100 W. Fifth Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
Premium
Estate,
100 West 5th Street Suite 900
Tulsa, OK 74103
Premium
Employment,
Twenty East Fifth Street Suite 200
Tulsa, OK 74103
Premium
Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Child Support, Family Law, Custody & Visitation
427 South Boston Suite 402
Tulsa, OK 74103
Offering free consultation. Call today to learn more about my fee structure.
Senior Partner
Clancy & Thompson, PLLC
Present
Tulsa, OK
Oklahoma
1990
University of Tulsa College of Law
Juris Doctorate (Law)
1990
University of Arkansas
BSBA (Finance)
1980
Associations
Honors / Awards
Cases
Appellant: Attorney for the appellant, Brad Taylor of D/B/A? Taylor System of Houston. Taylor appeals the summary judgement granted by the district courts in favor the defendant-appellee, Travelers Insurance Company. Taylor was hired to repair car exteriors damaged while parked outside of the Case plant. The cars needed to have ferrous oxide removed. Taylor completed the job but some of the cars were damaged in the process. Case sued Taylor for damages. Taylor requested that Travelers defend him in the lawsuit as part of the liability insurance policy he had with them for his garage. Travelers refused to defend him and Taylor sued. Upon review of his policy the district court found that the Traveler's was not responsible for representing him or for recovering the income loss he suffered from having to pay case for damages. The appeals court review all the information and found that the district courts had not erred in their decision. The judgement was affirmed.
Accident & Injury, Insurance, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation, Vaccine Injury
