Wanaque Criminal Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Francis Crotty
About | Practice Areas
Francis P. Crotty Esq.
103 Sterling Dr Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417» view map
Criminal Defense
Experience You Can Trust

Let Francis P. Crotty Esq. handle all of your criminal defense legal matters today.

201-294-6462
1. Francis Crotty Franklin Lakes, NJ
  Attorney at Law- NJ
  Fordham University School of Law, J.D. 1975
2. AboutFrancis P. Crotty Esq.
  Experience You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert J. Stack

Divorce, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11 Kiel Avenue, Kinnelon, NJ 07405

William Neafsey

Education, Timeshare, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oakland, NJ 07436

Christopher Perry

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417

Jennifer Holowach

Health Care, Criminal, Civil Rights, Labor Law, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Ringwood, NJ 07456

Michael Woyce

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Ringwood, NJ 07456

Linda Claude-Oben

Real Estate, Intellectual Property, Criminal, Entertainment

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Butler, NJ 07405

Laurie Fierro

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Butler, NJ 07405

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bieniek

... Bieniek. As a result of the collision, defendant faced criminal charges to which he ultimately pled guilty. ... sentence. In reviewing defendant's sentencing, resort must be had to traditional principles of appellate review of a criminal sentence. ...

State v. Nunez-Valdez

... Jeffrey S. Mandel, Morristown, argued the cause for amici curiae Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey and American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (Pinilis Halpern and Edward L. Barocas, attorneys). ...

State v. Watkins

... Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court. The primary purpose of Pretrial Intervention (PTI) is to assist in the rehabilitation of worthy defendants, and, in the process, to spare them the rigors of the criminal justice system. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Wanaque Criminal Lawyer, New Jersey

Sponsored Law Firm

Francis P. Crotty Esq.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert J. Stack

William Neafsey

Christopher Perry

Jennifer Holowach

Michael Woyce

Linda Claude-Oben

Laurie Fierro

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

BURDEN OF PROOF

DIRECTED VERDICT

PROSECUTOR

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

INFORMED CONSENT

FEDERAL COURT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Bieniek

State v. Nunez-Valdez

State v. Watkins

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details