William Budigan
30 Years of Experience Providing Individual Attention to Your Case.
30 Years of Experience Providing Individual Attention to Your Case.
2601 42nd Ave West
Seattle, WA 98199
Serving Seattle, WA and the surrounding area.
Accident & Injury,
4800 Aurora Ave N
Seattle, WA 98103
Divorce & Family Law,
1200 Westlake Ave N #1006
Seattle, WA 98109
Accident & Injury, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Slip & Fall Accident
2101 4th Ave, #1030
Seattle, WA 98121
Civil & Human Rights, Accident & Injury, Employment, Immigration, Divorce & Family Law
1700 7th Ave Suite 2100
Seattle, WA 98101
Accident & Injury, Mass Torts,
P.O. Box 9091
Seattle, WA 98109
Accident & Injury, Car Accident, Slip & Fall Accident, Personal Injury, Premises Liability
500 Union Street Suite 645
Seattle, WA 98101
Divorce & Family Law, Family Law, Divorce, Children's Rights,
1001 4th Ave Suite 4400
Seattle, WA 98154
Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Civil Rights,
110 Prefontaine Pl S Suite 304
Seattle, WA 98104
Estate, Personal Injury, Immigration, Divorce & Family Law,
659 S Weller St
Seattle, WA 98104
Call to schedule and initial free consultation, 800-260-9780.
Attorney
Budigan Law Firm
1985- Present
Seattle, WA
Washington
1983
Attorney for the Plaintiff in a case in which the Plaintiff claims the Defendants' are liable for Due Process and Equal Protection violations and for state law actions of fraud. Said case stemmed from a previous Washington State case in which the Plaintiff sued the Defendant in auto accident civil suit. After several losses in various courts, the Plaintiff filed this motion. The Court granted the Defendants' motions to dismiss, and denied Plaintiff's pending motions.
IN RE: the Marriage of Samuel R. BELL
Appellant: Attorney for the appellant, Kimberly Bell. Bell was married to Samuel Bell for five years, during which time the couple had two children together. The respondent, Samuel Bell also had found children from previously relationships. At the time of his divorce he was already paying half his income in child support to the other children. Based on this fact a King County court only ordered him to pay $400 in child support for he and Ms. Bell's children, an amount significantly lower than his other children received. Kimberly Bell appealed this decision. A judge reviewed the case and found that the court had erred in reducing the amount of support for the children. IN addition they had erred in subtracting his child support obligations from his income to determined the amount he would be ordered to pay Ms. Bell. The court remanded the issue back to the family courts. Modification of his existing support obligations may be necessary in order for all children to receive necessary and equitable support.
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate