William Budigan
30 Years of Experience Providing Individual Attention to Your Case.
30 Years of Experience Providing Individual Attention to Your Case.
Accident & Injury,
4800 Aurora Ave N
Seattle, WA 98103
Divorce & Family Law,
1200 Westlake Ave N #1006
Seattle, WA 98109
Car Accident,
600 Stewart Street Suite 434
Seattle, WA 98101
Accident & Injury, Employment,
600 Stewart St Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98101
Accident & Injury, Employment,
600 Stewart St Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98101
Accident & Injury, Employment,
600 Stewart St Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98101
Accident & Injury, Employment,
600 Stewart St Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98101
Employment, Accident & Injury, Civil Rights, Personal Injury,
600 Stewart St Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98101
Business, Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Litigation,
600 Stewart St Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98101
Call to schedule and initial free consultation, 800-260-9780.
Attorney
Budigan Law Firm
1985- Present
Seattle, WA
Washington
1983
University of Illinois College of Law
JD
1983
Attorney for the Plaintiff in a case in which the Plaintiff claims the Defendants' are liable for Due Process and Equal Protection violations and for state law actions of fraud. Said case stemmed from a previous Washington State case in which the Plaintiff sued the Defendant in auto accident civil suit. After several losses in various courts, the Plaintiff filed this motion. The Court granted the Defendants' motions to dismiss, and denied Plaintiff's pending motions.
IN RE: the Marriage of Samuel R. BELL
Appellant: Attorney for the appellant, Kimberly Bell. Bell was married to Samuel Bell for five years, during which time the couple had two children together. The respondent, Samuel Bell also had found children from previously relationships. At the time of his divorce he was already paying half his income in child support to the other children. Based on this fact a King County court only ordered him to pay $400 in child support for he and Ms. Bell's children, an amount significantly lower than his other children received. Kimberly Bell appealed this decision. A judge reviewed the case and found that the court had erred in reducing the amount of support for the children. IN addition they had erred in subtracting his child support obligations from his income to determined the amount he would be ordered to pay Ms. Bell. The court remanded the issue back to the family courts. Modification of his existing support obligations may be necessary in order for all children to receive necessary and equitable support.
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate