Winchester Discrimination Lawyer, Virginia


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Charles W. Gittins

Military, Litigation, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Todd A. Steiner

Communication & Media Law, Civil Rights, Trusts, Business
Status:  In Good Standing           

Elizabeth McCall

Elder Law, Trusts, Employment
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  39 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Email, Phone, Text Messages, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Winchester Discrimination Lawyers and Winchester Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Winborne v. Virginia Lottery

... 3. Under Bacon v. City of Richmond, 475 F.3d 633 (4th Cir.2007), the Virginia Lottery and its executive director are not liable for the alleged claims of disability discrimination against the Petitioners; and. 4. Pursuant to Bacon, injunctive ...

Hopkins v. Com.

... [3]. The trial court ruled, assuming a prima facie case of discrimination was made, there was "sufficient cause" for the first two strikes based on the Commonwealth's knowledge of the jurors' criminal records. The trial court continued: ...

Hopkins v. Commonwealth

... [2]. The trial court ruled, assuming a prima facie case of discrimination was made, there was "sufficient cause" for the first two strikes based on the Commonwealth's knowledge of the jurors' criminal records. The trial court continued: ...